Warning

Info

Case Brief Template for Law Students

A Structured Approach to Briefing Cases for Law School
Tags: case brief, class prep
Apr 2, 2023

There are many ways to brief a case. This article breaks down a few example templates that we have collected to give you some ideas.

After a law student has briefed a few cases:

The best case brief template is one that a student makes for themselves

I know, I know. You came here looking for a template and I am saying "Make your own" which isn't super helpful.

But how you learn and what your professors focus on is unique, and so how you brief a case can be unique, too. But looking at templates is still helpful because it will give law students some examples to pick from in order to craft their own. A very special franken-brief.

This article will outline two examples of case brief templates

I recommend trying them (and any others that you find online or from classmates/friends) out and picking the parts from each that help you, and that are most relevant to the class and to the case.

Case brief template example 1

This Template has 12 Parts (9 standard and 3 optional)

Standard

  1. Name of Case
  2. Parties
  3. Procedure
  4. Issue
  5. Facts
  6. Rule
  7. Analysis/Application
  8. Holding
  9. Judgment

Optional:

  1. Policy
  2. Dicta
  3. Dissent

Detailed explanations of the template components

Standard Parts

Name of Case

Start by writing the name of the case at the top of your case brief, like "Smith v. Jones." I know it sounds simple, but it helps.

Parties

Identify who the plaintiff and defendant are. If you don't want to write the names over and over consider abbreviating them, like with a "P" and "D."

Procedure

Identify where the case is being heard (state or federal court) and at which stage in the judicial process the case is in when the issue arises.

Issue

Identify the legal issue that the case is addressing.

Facts

BrieflySummarize the relevant facts of the case. Focus on legally significant facts. Focusing your brief will cut down on the time it takes you to brief.

Rule

Identify the rule of law that the court applied. This may be straightforwardThis may be straightforward, or the court may have fashioned a new rule.

Analysis/Application

Describe the court’s reasoning. Explain how the court applied the rule to the facts.

Holding

This is the court's legal conclusion. What did the court decide?

Judgment

This is the court's ultimate disposition of the case. Did the court grant or deny a motion? Affirm or reverse a lower court?

Optional:

Policy

If the court provides any public policy reasons for its adoption of a new rule or its application of an old rule to a novel situation, briefly note those reasons.

Dicta

Sometimes, the court provides an extended discussion of an issue that is not necessary to reach the holding. This is known as "dicta." These are occasionally discussed in class and sometimes become important in future lessons.

Dissent

If the casebook includes a dissenting opinion, jot down one or two sentences about the dissent’s point of view. It can be just as important as a majority opinion.

Case brief template example 2

This one is a little shorter. It might be a good choice if you are looking to brief cases a little more quickly.

This Template has 7 Parts

  1. Title: Parties and case reference.
  2. Facts: Summarize key facts and rulings.
  3. Issues: Define legal questions concisely.
  4. Decisions: Court's answers to legal questions.
  5. Reasoning: Judges' thought process explained.
  6. Separate Opinions: Analyze concurring/dissenting views.
  7. Analysis: Evaluate case significance and impact.

Detailed explanations of the template components

Title and Citation

The title indicates the parties involved in the case, with the first name being the party that initiated legal action, like "Brown v. Board of Education". Citations are similar but slightly different. they act as a reference to locate the case in the appropriate case book and/or reporter, making it easier to track and study (but not exactly easy to read), like "347 U.S. 483, 98 L. Ed. 2d 873, 74 S. Ct. 686, 1954 U.S. LEXIS 2094, SCDB 1953-069"

Facts of the Case

A detailed summary of the essential facts and legal points raised in the case. It covers the nature of the litigation, parties involved, relevant occurrences, and lower court rulings. The summary helps to establish context and provides a foundation for understanding the court's published opinion.

Issues

The legal issues or questions raised by the case, often stated as a question. In general, issues should be phrased in a way that allows for clear "yes" or "no" answers, focusing on the case's nature, lower court opinions, or parties on appeal. Identifying these issues is crucial for understanding the legal implications of the case. It can help to identify the issue before you even start the reading in order to guide you. Using something like LSD+ Case Briefs, can help.

Decisions/Holdings

The court's response to the legal questions presented, which can range from simple "yes" or "no" answers to broader and more complex interpretations of statutes, the Constitution, or judicial doctrines. Decisions may include narrow procedural holdings, such as "case reversed and remanded," or broader substantive holdings based on legal interpretations.

Reasoning/Rationale

The thought process and chain of arguments behind the judges' decisions, both in concurring and dissenting opinions. This reasoning is critical for understanding the legal principles applied and the rationale for the final decision. It can reveal how the court considered the facts and rules relevant to the problem. Typically, Professors will assign specific page ranges of case books that cover specific opinions. These are usually the ones that you should focus on.

Separate Opinions

When in the assigned reading, both concurring and dissenting opinions should be analyzed in-depth to identify areas of agreement or disagreement with the majority opinion. This analysis includes stating how each judge voted and their alignment on the issue. Familiarity with judges' typical stances can help anticipate their likely votes in future cases involving similar issues.

Analysis

The evaluation of the case's significance, its relationship to other cases, and its place in history. It is particularly helpful to map each case to other relevant cases that you have learned throughout the course. This will help to structure your outline which is a typical study tool for exams.

The analysis section involves determining the case's impact on the court, its officials, and decision-making processes, as well as its effects on litigants, government, and society. Analyzing the case also entails examining the judges' implicit assumptions and values, the appropriateness of the decision, and the logic of the reasoning.

No template is perfect

Hopefully, with a few reps in, you can create a system that works for you to cut down on the time it takes to read.

Case briefs (like ours) or from classmates, can help as well.

Related Articles

  1. Preparing for Class
  2. Case Brief Generator
  3. Writing an Effective Case Brief for Students
  4. 1L Curriculum
Windsor MIT '22, Harvard College Advisor

I am the half of LSD that didn't take the LSAT, or go to law school (Sorry about that). But I did go to MIT business school while surrounded by law students and lawyers, so I am somewhat qualified to talk about the intricacies of law school apps and finances.

Windsor (the dog) didn't write this but he WAS a Resident Tutor and career advisor at Harvard College with me, so deserves some credit.

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
18:47
@TruthTheX: praying for your gulc uprising
19:15
Ty me too 🙏
19:15
@Silver: if you want to practice in IL then there’s likely no better school than the in state schools
@SpectacularDefiantMouse: yeah, like condemnedpuffygnome, I'm not really preparing for law school by taking some courses or anything like that. The only way I'm going to be preparing is by getting myself into a rhythm schedule-wise, well enough in advance of the first day of classes, that I think will be necessary for me to do well 1L.
I'm very much not in rhythm now. lol. But I've 3-ish months.
19:55
@Silver: Cost of attendance is what matters. $37K in-state tuition = $47K sticker price with a $10K scholarship elsewhere, $70K sticker with a $40K scholarship is better than either, $40K sticker with a $0 scholarship worse than both.
19:55
(Assuming placement etc. is comparable)
Congrats on Harvard, jb2028. Any reason you applied to A&M but not Texas at Austin? Seems odd.
19:58
@BankruptcyAndRestructuringLawIsCool: Family connection, they gave me a CAS waiver so it was free
Question for the chat about judicial internships (not externships). My understanding is that judicial internships (as opposed to externships) during the summer are unpaid. How, then, do people who get them pay living expenses during the summer? Do they just make loans stretch for 12 months when they're only meant for 9? I heard that some people supplement the internship with, e.g., a research assistant position with a law professor. But would such a person both do the internship and the RA position at the same time? And if so, is that too much work or feasible?
I don't know what the workload is really like for judicial internships and RA positions.
Also curious what other things people might do to supplement an unpaid judicial internship over the summer with something paid.
20:20
@BankruptcyAndRestructuringLawIsCool: Many schools will provide some type of stipend for unpaid summer roles with a public interest employer (defined broadly, often includes any gov or judicial job)
Right, I thought so. At BU, though, it appears that what's called BU's public interest project grant is not available to supplement judicial internships. And I think its public service summer funding is also limited. Oh well.
21:13
@BankruptcyAndRestructuringLawIsCool: FWIW they allude to some type of funding ("BU Law has implemented separate funding sources for judicial interns") in this packet https://www.bu.edu/law/files/2023/11/Public-Service-Summer-Funding-Applicant-Packet-2024.pdf
21:13
Although they don't give details, and as you note they don't guarantee funding to everyone (which is in line with other $ they offer, e.g. the LRAP)
21:14
Anyone know how hard it is to do pro bono work as a 1L for judges or fed gov in general in the D.C. market
21:14
Idk much about pro bono opportunities period but thinking I wanna try to get some work experience as soon as humanly possible
21:14
When I begin law school I mean
21:15
Lines up with BU's limited endowment: $81K per student a few years ago, i.e., enough to support a payout of about $3,250 per student per year at a 4% payout rate https://leiterlawschool.typepad.com/leiter/2022/05/per-student-value-of-law-school-endowments-2021.html
21:17
Seems like they're trying to compete with other schools on program headlines (we fund X, Y, and Z and we have an LRAP) but the endowment can't really support that, so they have all these programs but don't guarantee funding. Would not rely on that if you have alternatives.
Thanks for those links. I'll give the public service summer funding information packet, in particular, a careful read. But yeah, your takeaway seems right.
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
22:33
i could really use some fried chicken right now
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
22:34
kfc or popeyes
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
22:34
or korean with gochujang
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
22:35
i might order some gochujang sauce on amazon and cook some air fried chicken breast filets, they’re really good
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
22:35
just letting you guys know :)
0:14
Where I can find the definition of the false-endowment?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.