Connection lost
Server error
ALASKAN OIL, INC. v. CENTRAL FLYING SERVICE, INC. Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A company that brokered the sale of a defective airplane to satisfy a debt was held strictly liable for the plane’s repair costs. The court found the broker was a statutory “supplier” and that Arkansas law permits tort recovery even when the only damage is to the product itself.
Legal Significance: This case affirms Arkansas’s adoption of the minority rule allowing strict liability claims for purely economic loss. It also establishes that a party with a substantial financial interest in a sale, beyond a mere commission, qualifies as a “supplier” for purposes of products liability.
ALASKAN OIL, INC. v. CENTRAL FLYING SERVICE, INC. Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Alaskan Oil, Inc. purchased a used Beechcraft airplane owned by G.W. Davis Construction Company. Central Flying Service, Inc., which had possession of the aircraft and was owed a substantial sum by Davis for repairs and storage, acted as the selling agent. The sale price was $65,000, of which Central Flying received approximately $53,000 to satisfy Davis’s outstanding debt. Over the next year, Alaskan Oil discovered extensive corrosion, ultimately rendering the plane “economically unfeasible” to repair. Alaskan Oil sold the aircraft for salvage and sued Davis and Central Flying. The only damages claimed were for the economic loss associated with the defective plane itself; no personal injury or damage to other property occurred. A jury found for Alaskan Oil on its strict liability claim, apportioning 80% of the liability to Central Flying. Central Flying appealed, arguing that strict liability is improper for purely economic loss, that the plane was not unreasonably dangerous, and that it was not a “supplier” under Arkansas law.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Under Arkansas law, can an entity that brokers the sale of a defective product be held strictly liable as a “supplier” when the only damages sustained are economic losses to the product itself?
Yes. The court affirmed the judgment, holding that Central Flying qualified as Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Under Arkansas law, can an entity that brokers the sale of a defective product be held strictly liable as a “supplier” when the only damages sustained are economic losses to the product itself?
Conclusion
This decision solidifies Arkansas's place among the minority of jurisdictions that reject Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut al
Legal Rule
A "supplier of a product" is strictly liable for damages caused by Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia dese
Legal Analysis
The Eighth Circuit addressed three main arguments from Central Flying. First, it Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- Under Arkansas law, a plaintiff can recover in strict product liability
