Connection lost
Server error
Assessment Technologies of WI, LLC v. Wiredata, Inc. Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A software company with a copyright on its database program sued to block access to the public domain data stored within it. The court held that extracting uncopyrightable raw data is not infringement, as copyright protects the program’s structure, not the data itself.
Legal Significance: This case strongly affirms that copyright in a compilation does not extend to the underlying uncopyrightable facts. A copyright holder cannot leverage its copyright to create a de facto monopoly over public domain data contained within the copyrighted work.
Assessment Technologies of WI, LLC v. Wiredata, Inc. Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Assessment Technologies (AT) owns the copyright for “Market Drive,” a software program used by municipal tax assessors in Wisconsin. The program organizes real estate data into a specific, original structure of 456 fields grouped into 34 tables. The underlying data—such as property address, owner’s name, and assessed valuation—are collected by the assessors, not by AT, and are considered public domain information under Wisconsin’s open records law. WIREdata, Inc. sought to obtain this raw data from several municipalities to use for its real estate information services. The municipalities, as licensees of AT’s software, refused WIREdata’s request, fearing that providing the data would constitute copyright infringement. AT sued WIREdata to enjoin it from seeking the data from the municipalities, arguing that the data could not be extracted without infringing its copyright on the Market Drive program’s compilation structure. The district court granted a permanent injunction in favor of AT.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does a copyright on a computer program for compiling data prevent third parties from extracting the uncopyrightable, public-domain data contained within the program’s database?
No. The court reversed the injunction, holding that extracting uncopyrightable raw data Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident,
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does a copyright on a computer program for compiling data prevent third parties from extracting the uncopyrightable, public-domain data contained within the program’s database?
Conclusion
The decision serves as a crucial limitation on the power of database Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliq
Legal Rule
Copyright protection for a factual compilation is "thin" and extends only to Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut ali
Legal Analysis
The Seventh Circuit, applying the principles of Feist, drew a sharp distinction Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Summary unavailable
No flash summary is available for this opinion.