Connection lost
Server error
BERKOVITZ v. UNITED STATES Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A man paralyzed by a polio vaccine sued the U.S. government. The Court held that the Federal Tort Claims Act’s discretionary function exception does not shield the government from liability when its employees violate a specific, mandatory federal statute, regulation, or policy.
Legal Significance: This case established the modern two-part test for applying the FTCA’s discretionary function exception. It clarified that the exception protects policy judgments but not the violation of mandatory directives, significantly narrowing the scope of governmental tort immunity for regulatory negligence.
BERKOVITZ v. UNITED STATES Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Kevan Berkovitz, an infant, contracted severe polio and became paralyzed after receiving an oral polio vaccine. The vaccine was manufactured by Lederle Laboratories and licensed by the Division of Biologic Standards (DBS), a federal agency. Berkovitz sued the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), alleging two forms of negligence. First, he claimed the DBS wrongfully licensed the vaccine in violation of federal statutes and regulations. Specifically, he alleged the DBS issued the license without receiving required safety data from the manufacturer and licensed a product that failed to meet regulatory safety standards. Second, he claimed the Bureau of Biologics (an FDA agency) wrongfully approved the release of the specific lot of vaccine he received. He alleged the Bureau had a policy of testing all lots and preventing the release of non-compliant ones, but knowingly approved a lot that failed to meet safety standards. The government moved to dismiss, arguing that these regulatory actions were protected by the FTCA’s discretionary function exception, which bars suits based on an employee’s performance of a discretionary function or duty.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does the discretionary function exception of the Federal Tort Claims Act bar a lawsuit against the United States based on a federal agency’s alleged negligence in licensing a polio vaccine and approving a specific lot for public release in violation of federal statutes and regulations?
No. The discretionary function exception does not necessarily bar the claims. The Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in volupta
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does the discretionary function exception of the Federal Tort Claims Act bar a lawsuit against the United States based on a federal agency’s alleged negligence in licensing a polio vaccine and approving a specific lot for public release in violation of federal statutes and regulations?
Conclusion
Berkovitz provides the definitive two-part framework for analyzing the FTCA's discretionary function Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud
Legal Rule
The discretionary function exception, 28 U.S.C. § 2680(a), shields the government from Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non pro
Legal Analysis
Justice Marshall, writing for a unanimous Court, established a two-part test to Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eius
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- The FTCA’s discretionary function exception shields government conduct only if it
