Connection lost
Server error
BROEMMER v. ABORTION SERVICES OF PHOENIX Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A patient signed a clinic’s pre-printed forms, including a binding arbitration agreement, before a procedure. The court refused to enforce the agreement, finding it was an adhesion contract with terms that fell outside the patient’s reasonable expectations.
Legal Significance: Establishes that a contract of adhesion, even if not unconscionable, is unenforceable if a term falls outside the adhering party’s reasonable expectations. This is particularly true for terms waiving fundamental rights, like a jury trial, which are not explicitly explained or negotiated.
BROEMMER v. ABORTION SERVICES OF PHOENIX Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Plaintiff Melinda Broemmer, a 21-year-old high school graduate under significant emotional distress, sought an abortion at a clinic operated by Abortion Services of Phoenix. Upon arrival, she was presented with three standardized forms and told to complete them. The forms included a medical history, a consent-to-operate, and an “Agreement to Arbitrate.” The arbitration agreement stipulated that any dispute over services would be resolved by binding arbitration and that the arbitrators must be OB/GYNs. Broemmer completed all forms in under five minutes without any explanation from clinic staff regarding the arbitration clause or its implications, such as the waiver of a jury trial. She was not given copies of the documents. Following a complication from the procedure where she suffered a punctured uterus, Broemmer filed a medical malpractice suit. The clinic moved to enforce the arbitration agreement. Broemmer submitted an uncontroverted affidavit stating she was in emotional turmoil, did not recall signing the arbitration agreement, and was not experienced in commercial matters.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Can a standardized arbitration agreement, presented as a condition of medical treatment on a “take it or leave it” basis, be enforced when its terms fall outside the reasonable expectations of the adhering party?
No. The court held the arbitration agreement was an unenforceable contract of Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolo
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Can a standardized arbitration agreement, presented as a condition of medical treatment on a “take it or leave it” basis, be enforced when its terms fall outside the reasonable expectations of the adhering party?
Conclusion
This case solidifies the application of the reasonable expectations doctrine as a Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit
Legal Rule
A contract of adhesion is unenforceable if it contains terms that are Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugi
Legal Analysis
The court first determined that the arbitration agreement was a contract of Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- An arbitration agreement in a medical services contract was held to