Connection lost
Server error
Cine Forty-Second Street Theatre Corp. v. Allied Artists Pictures Corp. Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A plaintiff’s attorney engaged in years of discovery misconduct. The court held that even without proof of willfulness, an attorney’s gross negligence in failing to comply with discovery orders is sufficient ‘fault’ to justify severe, case-dispositive sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37.
Legal Significance: This case established that ‘fault’ under FRCP 37 includes gross negligence, not just willfulness or bad faith. It empowers courts to impose the harshest sanctions for discovery abuse to deter misconduct and hold litigants accountable for their chosen counsel’s ‘total dereliction of professional responsibility.’
Cine Forty-Second Street Theatre Corp. v. Allied Artists Pictures Corp. Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Plaintiff Cine Forty-Second Street Theatre Corp. filed an antitrust suit. During discovery, Cine engaged in a years-long pattern of non-compliance with defendants’ interrogatories, particularly those concerning the calculation of damages. Despite numerous extensions, court orders from a magistrate judge, and a monetary sanction, Cine repeatedly submitted late and grossly deficient answers. The magistrate eventually found Cine’s non-compliance to be willful and recommended precluding it from presenting evidence on damages—a sanction tantamount to dismissing that claim. The district court judge agreed the conduct was egregious but felt he could not impose such a severe sanction without a finding of willfulness, which he could not definitively make. The judge characterized counsel’s conduct as either ‘wilful or a total dereliction of professional responsibility’ (i.e., gross negligence). Believing he lacked authority under existing circuit precedent to impose the recommended sanction for gross negligence alone, the judge imposed a lesser sanction and certified the question for interlocutory appeal.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does a district court have the discretion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37 to impose a case-dispositive sanction when a party’s failure to comply with a discovery order is due to gross professional negligence rather than willfulness or bad faith?
Yes. The court reversed the district court’s order, holding that a grossly Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliqu
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does a district court have the discretion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37 to impose a case-dispositive sanction when a party’s failure to comply with a discovery order is due to gross professional negligence rather than willfulness or bad faith?
Conclusion
This case significantly broadened the authority of federal courts to police discovery, Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex
Legal Rule
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37, a finding of 'fault,' which Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in volup
Legal Analysis
The Second Circuit's analysis centered on the interpretation of the Supreme Court's Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magn
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, severe sanctions like dismissal or
