Connection lost
Server error
COLMENARES VIVAS v. SUN ALLIANCE INS. CO. Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A public airport authority was held to have a non-delegable duty to keep its escalators safe. Thus, it retained “exclusive control” for res ipsa loquitur purposes, even though an independent contractor performed maintenance, allowing an inference of negligence when an escalator malfunctioned and caused injury.
Legal Significance: Establishes that a defendant with a non-delegable duty of care (like a public authority or business owner) retains “exclusive control” for applying res ipsa loquitur, even when physical control is shared with or delegated to an independent contractor, thus expanding the doctrine’s application.
COLMENARES VIVAS v. SUN ALLIANCE INS. CO. Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Plaintiffs Jose and Dilia Colmenares were riding an escalator at an airport operated by the Puerto Rico Ports Authority (Ports Authority). The moving handrail suddenly stopped while the steps continued to ascend. This caused Mrs. Colmenares to lose her balance. Her husband, in preventing her fall, lost his own balance and tumbled down the escalator, sustaining injuries. The plaintiffs sued the Ports Authority’s insurer, Sun Alliance Insurance Company. The Ports Authority had a maintenance contract with Westinghouse Electric Corporation, which required Westinghouse to inspect, maintain, and repair the escalator. At trial, after the plaintiffs presented their evidence of the malfunction and their injuries, the defendant moved for a directed verdict. The district court granted the motion, ruling that there was no direct evidence of negligence and that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur did not apply because the Ports Authority did not have “exclusive control” over the escalator due to the maintenance contract with Westinghouse.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: For the purpose of applying the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, does a public authority that owes a non-delegable duty to maintain safe premises retain “exclusive control” over an instrumentality, such as an escalator, even when it has contracted with a third party for its maintenance?
Yes. The court reversed the directed verdict, holding that all three requirements Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in vo
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
For the purpose of applying the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, does a public authority that owes a non-delegable duty to maintain safe premises retain “exclusive control” over an instrumentality, such as an escalator, even when it has contracted with a third party for its maintenance?
Conclusion
This case significantly clarifies the "exclusive control" element of res ipsa loquitur, Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliqui
Legal Rule
For res ipsa loquitur to apply, a plaintiff must show: (1) the Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit
Legal Analysis
The court's analysis centered on the "exclusive control" element of res ipsa Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsu
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- Res ipsa loquitur applies to an escalator malfunction because the event