Connection lost
Server error
COOLIDGE v. NEW HAMPSHIRE Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: The Supreme Court suppressed evidence seized from a suspect’s car, holding that a warrant issued by the prosecuting attorney was invalid. The Court also narrowly construed the “automobile” and “plain view” exceptions to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement.
Legal Significance: This case established that a warrant must be issued by a neutral magistrate, not a prosecutor. It also introduced the controversial “inadvertent discovery” requirement for the plain view doctrine and limited the automobile exception to situations with genuine exigency.
COOLIDGE v. NEW HAMPSHIRE Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Following a murder investigation, police developed probable cause to arrest Edward Coolidge and search his Pontiac automobile. The State Attorney General, who was actively directing the investigation and would later serve as chief prosecutor, acting in his capacity as a justice of the peace, issued the arrest and search warrants. Police arrested Coolidge inside his home and, two hours later, had his car, which was parked in the driveway, towed to the police station. The car was searched two days after being seized, and subsequent searches occurred a year later. Vacuum sweepings from the car, which linked Coolidge to the victim, were introduced at trial. Separately, police obtained guns and clothing from Coolidge’s wife, who voluntarily turned them over at the family home while Coolidge was at the police station. Coolidge was convicted of murder, and he challenged the admission of the evidence from both the car and the home.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: May police, acting without a valid warrant or exigent circumstances, seize a suspect’s automobile from his private driveway and search it at a later time, and does the plain view doctrine justify such a seizure when the police had prior knowledge of the vehicle’s location and intended to seize it?
No. The Court held that the seizure and subsequent search of the Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
May police, acting without a valid warrant or exigent circumstances, seize a suspect’s automobile from his private driveway and search it at a later time, and does the plain view doctrine justify such a seizure when the police had prior knowledge of the vehicle’s location and intended to seize it?
Conclusion
Coolidge significantly reinforced the warrant requirement by narrowing the scope of the Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut
Legal Rule
A search warrant is invalid unless issued by a neutral and detached Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit es
Legal Analysis
The Court's analysis proceeded in several parts. First, it invalidated the search Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, qu
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A search warrant is invalid if issued by a law enforcement