Hate ads? Verify for LSD+ → Learn More

Case Citation
Legal Case Name

Davis Ex Rel. LaShonda D. v. Monroe County Board of Education Case Brief

Supreme Court of the United States1999Docket #2509207
143 L. Ed. 2d 839 119 S. Ct. 1661 526 U.S. 629 1999 U.S. LEXIS 3452 12 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 280 67 U.S.L.W. 4329 1999 Colo. J. C.A.R. 2948 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3861 99 Daily Journal DAR 4931 Education Law Constitutional Law Civil Rights Law Torts

Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs

Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.

Adaptive Case Views

Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.

Exam-Ready IRAC Format

We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.

Complex Cases, Clarified

We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.

Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis

General Brief
3 min read

tl;dr: The Supreme Court held that a federally funded school district can be sued for money damages under Title IX for failing to stop severe and pervasive student-on-student sexual harassment, but only if the school was deliberately indifferent to known acts of harassment.

Legal Significance: Established that educational institutions can be liable for student-on-student sexual harassment under Title IX, creating a “deliberate indifference” standard grounded in the Spending Clause’s requirement that funding recipients have clear notice of their obligations.

Davis Ex Rel. LaShonda D. v. Monroe County Board of Education Law School Study Guide

Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.

Case Facts & Court Holding

Key Facts & Case Background

Petitioner LaShonda D., a fifth-grade student, was subjected to a prolonged pattern of sexual harassment by a male classmate, G.F., over a five-month period. The harassment included repeated attempts to touch her breasts and genitals, vulgar sexual propositions, and sexually suggestive gestures. LaShonda and her mother reported each incident to her teachers and the school principal. Despite these repeated complaints from LaShonda and other female students about G.F.’s conduct, school officials took no disciplinary action against him and made no effort to separate him from LaShonda. The school board had not implemented any policy or training regarding peer sexual harassment. As a result of the persistent harassment, LaShonda’s academic performance declined significantly, and she became suicidal. G.F. eventually pleaded guilty to sexual battery. Petitioner sued the Monroe County Board of Education for damages under Title IX, alleging its deliberate indifference to the harassment created a hostile educational environment.

Court Holding & Legal Precedent

Issue: Can a recipient of federal education funds be held liable in a private damages action under Title IX for its deliberate indifference to known, severe, and pervasive student-on-student sexual harassment?

Yes. A recipient of federal education funds may be liable for damages Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Ex

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?

IRAC Legal Analysis

Premium Feature Unlock

Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades

IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.

Legal Issue

Can a recipient of federal education funds be held liable in a private damages action under Title IX for its deliberate indifference to known, severe, and pervasive student-on-student sexual harassment?

Conclusion

This landmark decision established a cause of action for student-on-student harassment under Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim ven

Legal Rule

A recipient of federal funds may be liable for damages under Title Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non p

Legal Analysis

The Court's analysis is rooted in the principle that Title IX is Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod

Flash-to-Full Case Opinions

Flash Summary

  • A school district receiving federal funds can be liable for damages
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat c

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?

Hate ads? Verify for LSD+ → Learn More