Connection lost
Server error
Donald R. Scribner v. Worldcom, Inc., a Georgia Corporation Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: An employer with contractual discretion to define “cause” for terminating stock options could not use a secret, non-performance-related definition. The court held this violated the employee’s justified expectations and the implied covenant of good faith, forcing the options to vest.
Legal Significance: A party’s contractual discretion to interpret terms is limited by the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, which protects the other party’s justified expectations based on the ordinary meaning of words and the spirit of the bargain.
Donald R. Scribner v. Worldcom, Inc., a Georgia Corporation Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Donald Scribner, an exemplary employee of WorldCom, received stock option agreements providing that his unvested options would accelerate and become immediately exercisable if he were terminated “without cause.” The contracts did not define “cause,” but the governing Stock Option Plan granted a committee appointed by WorldCom’s Board broad discretion to interpret the plan’s terms. WorldCom subsequently sold the division in which Scribner worked and, as a condition of the sale, terminated his employment. The termination was concededly not due to any deficiency in Scribner’s performance. Despite this, the committee exercised its discretion and determined that the termination was “with cause” for the purpose of the stock option agreements, thereby preventing the options from vesting. The committee’s stated rationale was that it was not in WorldCom’s interest for former employees to retain options. Scribner refused a partial vesting offer that required a release of all claims and sued for breach of contract when WorldCom refused his attempt to exercise all his options.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing prevent a party with discretionary authority to interpret a contract from defining a term like “cause” in a way that contradicts its ordinary meaning and frustrates the other party’s justified expectations?
Yes. The committee breached the implied covenant of good faith and fair Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat n
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing prevent a party with discretionary authority to interpret a contract from defining a term like “cause” in a way that contradicts its ordinary meaning and frustrates the other party’s justified expectations?
Conclusion
This case establishes that contractual discretion is not a license to redefine Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud e
Legal Rule
Under Washington law, a party's discretionary authority under a contract is limited Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt molli
Legal Analysis
The court, applying Washington contract law, determined the parties' intent by examining Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- In a stock option contract, an undefined term like “termination without