Connection lost
Server error
Edward M. Selfe and Jane B. Selfe v. United States Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: An S-corporation shareholder personally guaranteed a corporate loan. The court held that the shareholder might increase her stock basis by the loan amount if, in substance, the bank loaned the funds to her and she then advanced them to the corporation.
Legal Significance: This case established that a shareholder’s guarantee of an S-corporation’s loan can, under a substance-over-form analysis, be treated as an equity investment or loan by the shareholder, thereby increasing their basis for loss deduction purposes.
Edward M. Selfe and Jane B. Selfe v. United States Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Jane B. Selfe, a shareholder in a Subchapter S corporation (Jane Simon, Inc.), sought financing for her retail clothing business. Initially, a bank extended a line of credit to Selfe personally, secured by her pledge of stock. Subsequently, at the bank’s request, these loans were converted to corporate loans, with Selfe executing a personal guarantee. The bank retained the pledged stock as collateral and its rights against Selfe as guarantor. The loan officer testified that the bank primarily looked to Selfe and her pledged stock for repayment, not the thinly capitalized corporation. The corporation incurred net operating losses. Selfe deducted the full loss on her personal income tax return, claiming her guarantee increased her stock basis. The IRS disallowed a portion of the deduction, asserting her basis was limited to her direct capital contributions, as she had not yet been required to pay on the guarantee. The district court granted summary judgment for the government.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: May a shareholder in a Subchapter S corporation, who personally guarantees and secures a corporate debt, increase the adjusted basis of her stock by the full amount of the debt if the facts demonstrate that, in substance, the shareholder borrowed the funds and subsequently advanced them to the corporation?
Yes. The court reversed the summary judgment for the government and remanded. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occa
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
May a shareholder in a Subchapter S corporation, who personally guarantees and secures a corporate debt, increase the adjusted basis of her stock by the full amount of the debt if the facts demonstrate that, in substance, the shareholder borrowed the funds and subsequently advanced them to the corporation?
Conclusion
This case affirms that taxpayers, not just the IRS, can invoke the Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo con
Legal Rule
Under I.R.C. § 1374, an S-corporation shareholder's loss deduction is limited to Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit ani
Legal Analysis
The court adopted the reasoning of *Plantation Patterns, Inc. v. Commissioner*, which Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- An S-corp shareholder’s personal guarantee of a corporate loan can increase