Connection lost
Server error
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Cross-Appellant, and Carol Cole and Luvenia Long, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees, Cross v. Madison Community Unit School District No. 12, Cross Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: Female coaches, paid less than male counterparts, sued a school district. The court held that paying female coaches less for coaching the same sport as male coaches violates the Equal Pay Act, but comparing pay across different sports constitutes an invalid “comparable worth” claim.
Legal Significance: This case clarifies the Equal Pay Act’s “equal work” standard, establishing that jobs must be “substantially equal,” not merely “comparable.” It permits comparing male and female coaching jobs for the same sport but rejects comparisons across different sports as an impermissible “comparable worth” theory.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Cross-Appellant, and Carol Cole and Luvenia Long, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees, Cross v. Madison Community Unit School District No. 12, Cross Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and several female coaches sued the Madison Community Unit School District, alleging violations of the Equal Pay Act (EPA) and Title VII. The female coaches were paid less than male coaches for various athletic coaching positions. For example, the female coach of the girls’ track team was paid less than the male coach of the boys’ track team, and the female coach of the girls’ softball team was paid less than the male coach of the boys’ baseball team. The district court found these jobs required equal skill, effort, and responsibility, noting that any differences in team size or season length were offset by the male coaches having more assistants. The plaintiffs also compared the pay for coaching girls’ volleyball and basketball to the pay for coaching boys’ soccer. The school district’s pay scale for coaches varied by sport, even among male coaches. Evidence also showed the district discouraged women from applying to coach boys’ teams, citing concerns about the “locker room problem.”
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does paying female coaches of girls’ sports teams less than male coaches of boys’ teams violate the Equal Pay Act’s “equal work” standard where the jobs involve coaching the same sport, and does a claim for pay disparity between coaches of different sports constitute an impermissible “comparable worth” claim?
Affirmed in part and reversed in part. The court held that comparing Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum do
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does paying female coaches of girls’ sports teams less than male coaches of boys’ teams violate the Equal Pay Act’s “equal work” standard where the jobs involve coaching the same sport, and does a claim for pay disparity between coaches of different sports constitute an impermissible “comparable worth” claim?
Conclusion
The case provides a crucial framework for applying the Equal Pay Act, Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, qui
Legal Rule
Under the Equal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d)(1), jobs need not Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariat
Legal Analysis
The court navigated the fine line between the EPA's requirement of "equal Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco lab
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- Under the Equal Pay Act, coaching boys’ and girls’ teams of