Connection lost
Server error
FAULKNER v. NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A publisher created a digital CD-ROM archive of its past magazines. Freelance contributors sued for copyright infringement. The court found the digital archive was a permissible “revision” of the original collective works under the Copyright Act, not an infringement.
Legal Significance: This case clarifies that a digital replica of a print collective work, even with new software features, can qualify as a privileged “revision” under § 201(c) of the Copyright Act, protecting publishers who create digital archives.
FAULKNER v. NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Plaintiffs, freelance writers and photographers, had their works published in the print version of the National Geographic Magazine. Defendant National Geographic Society (NGS), which owned the copyrights in the collective works (the individual magazine issues), created “The Complete National Geographic” (CNG), a digital archive on CD-ROM and DVD. The CNG contained high-resolution digital scans of every page from over 100 years of the magazine, presenting each page exactly as it appeared in the original print version, including all text, images, advertisements, and layout. In addition to these exact replicas, the CNG included new, independently copyrightable elements: a software program for viewing and navigating the collection, a search engine, and a brief introductory multimedia sequence. The plaintiffs sued NGS and its partners for copyright infringement, arguing that the creation and sale of the CNG exceeded the publication rights they had granted and was not privileged under the Copyright Act.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does the creation of a digital archive containing exact replicas of print magazine issues, but adding new software features like a search engine and an introductory sequence, constitute a privileged ‘revision’ of the original collective work under § 201(c) of the Copyright Act?
Yes. The court held that the CNG is a privileged “revision” of Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui off
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does the creation of a digital archive containing exact replicas of print magazine issues, but adding new software features like a search engine and an introductory sequence, constitute a privileged ‘revision’ of the original collective work under § 201(c) of the Copyright Act?
Conclusion
This decision provides significant protection for publishers creating digital archives of their Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation
Legal Rule
Under § 201(c) of the Copyright Act, the owner of a copyright Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qu
Legal Analysis
The court first declined to apply collateral estoppel based on a prior, Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- Issue: Does a digital archive of a magazine, which includes new