Case Citation
Legal Case Name

FW Woolworth v. Kirby Case Brief

Supreme Court of Alabama1974Docket #1745251
302 So. 2d 67 293 Ala. 248 1974 Ala. LEXIS 957 Torts Evidence Civil Procedure

Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs

Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.

Adaptive Case Views

Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.

Exam-Ready IRAC Format

We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.

Complex Cases, Clarified

We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.

Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis

General Brief
3 min read

tl;dr: A store held a promotional “ping-pong ball drop” that attracted a large, chaotic crowd. An elderly woman was knocked down and injured by the crowd. The court held the store had a duty to protect her from the foreseeable actions of other patrons.

Legal Significance: This case establishes that a business proprietor owes a duty of reasonable care to protect patrons from foreseeable injuries caused by crowds the business intentionally assembles for a promotional event, making the foreseeability of crowd behavior a question for the jury.

FW Woolworth v. Kirby Law School Study Guide

Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.

Case Facts & Court Holding

Key Facts & Case Background

F. W. Woolworth Company (Defendant) organized a promotional “ping-pong ball drop” at its store to attract customers. The event involved dropping 768 ping-pong balls, each containing a prize certificate, from an airplane into the store’s parking lot. Extensive advertising drew a crowd estimated at 4,500 people. The pilot hired for the drop warned the defendant that he could not control where the balls would fall. Lona Pearl Kirby (Plaintiff), a 70-year-old woman, went to the parking lot to watch the event. During the third drop, the crowd rushed to catch the falling balls, and in the ensuing chaos, someone knocked the plaintiff down and others ran over her, causing serious injuries, including a broken hip. There was evidence that other patrons had also been knocked down during the previous two drops. Plaintiff sued, alleging the defendant was negligent in failing to control the crowd it had amassed. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff.

Court Holding & Legal Precedent

Issue: Does a business proprietor who organizes a promotional event that attracts a large crowd owe a duty of reasonable care to protect an invitee from being injured by the foreseeable pushing and shoving of other patrons participating in the event?

Yes. The defendant owed a duty to exercise reasonable care to protect Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nu

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?

IRAC Legal Analysis

Premium Feature Unlock

Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades

IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.

Legal Issue

Does a business proprietor who organizes a promotional event that attracts a large crowd owe a duty of reasonable care to protect an invitee from being injured by the foreseeable pushing and shoving of other patrons participating in the event?

Conclusion

This case is a key precedent in premises liability, clarifying that a Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut eni

Legal Rule

When a proprietor or storekeeper causes a crowd of people to assemble Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat c

Legal Analysis

The Supreme Court of Alabama established a duty of care for proprietors Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore mag

Flash-to-Full Case Opinions

Flash Summary

  • A business that organizes a promotional event has a duty to
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?

A lawyer is a person who writes a 10,000-word document and calls it a 'brief'.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+