Connection lost
Server error
GRAND UPRIGHT MUSIC v. WARNER BROS. RECORDS, INC. Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A record label and artist used an unauthorized sample from a copyrighted song. The court granted an injunction, famously stating “Thou shalt not steal,” and referred the defendants for criminal prosecution, signaling a major shift against unlicensed sampling in the music industry.
Legal Significance: This landmark case established that unlicensed digital sampling constitutes copyright infringement, regardless of industry practice. Its harsh tone and criminal referral sent a powerful message that sampling without permission is theft and will not be tolerated by the courts.
GRAND UPRIGHT MUSIC v. WARNER BROS. RECORDS, INC. Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Defendants, including recording artist Biz Markie and Warner Bros. Records, released a rap song that incorporated a direct musical sample from Gilbert O’Sullivan’s 1972 song “Alone Again (Naturally).” Defendants admitted to using the sample. Prior to releasing the album, the defendants’ representatives contacted O’Sullivan’s agent to seek a license for the sample but proceeded with the commercial release before securing permission. The plaintiff, Grand Upright Music, Ltd., sued for copyright infringement and sought a preliminary injunction. To prove ownership, the plaintiff presented copyright certificates and transfer deeds establishing its chain of title. O’Sullivan, the song’s composer, also testified that the plaintiff was the rightful owner. Defendants challenged the admissibility of the ownership documents and implicitly argued that their conduct should be excused because sampling was a common practice in the music industry.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does the unauthorized incorporation of a recognizable, copyrighted musical sample into a new commercial recording constitute copyright infringement for which a preliminary injunction is warranted?
Yes. The court granted the preliminary injunction, holding that the defendants’ unlicensed Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does the unauthorized incorporation of a recognizable, copyrighted musical sample into a new commercial recording constitute copyright infringement for which a preliminary injunction is warranted?
Conclusion
This decision effectively ended the era of unchecked digital sampling in the Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco
Legal Rule
The unauthorized copying and use of any portion of a copyrighted musical Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cill
Legal Analysis
The court unequivocally rejected the defendants' defense, which it characterized as an Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est lab
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- Unlicensed digital sampling of a copyrighted work constitutes copyright infringement, which