Connection lost
Server error
Harbor Funding Corp. v. Kavanagh Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A mortgage on Maine property contained a Massachusetts choice-of-law clause. Upon default, the court held Maine law, the law of the situs, governed the foreclosure method, not the contractually chosen Massachusetts law.
Legal Significance: Reinforces the dominant principle that the law of the situs (lex rei sitae) governs the method of foreclosing a mortgage on real property, overriding contractual choice-of-law provisions.
Harbor Funding Corp. v. Kavanagh Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
In 1990, Harbor Funding Corporation provided purchase money financing to Litchfield Square Associates (LSA) for property in Wells, Maine. James Kavanagh, a general partner of LSA, signed the note as partner and individual guarantor. The loan was secured by a mortgage on the Wells property, signed by Kavanagh as a general partner. The mortgage included a provision stating: “This mortgage and all of the provisions hereof are to be governed, construed and enforced by and according to the laws and statutes of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.” It also referenced a “STATUTORY POWER OF SALE.” Subsequently, the loan and mortgage were modified, with Kavanagh remaining liable, but the choice-of-law provision was unchanged. In 1993, after LSA defaulted, Harbor Funding initiated a civil foreclosure action in Maine pursuant to Maine’s statutory procedures (14 M.R.S.A. § 6321). Kavanagh contested, arguing that Massachusetts law should govern the foreclosure as per the mortgage’s terms. The Superior Court granted summary judgment for Harbor Funding, ordering foreclosure under Maine law.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does a contractual choice-of-law provision stipulating the application of foreign law govern the method of foreclosing a mortgage on real property located in Maine, or does Maine law, as the law of the situs, control?
Maine law, as the law of the situs, controls the method of Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commod
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does a contractual choice-of-law provision stipulating the application of foreign law govern the method of foreclosing a mortgage on real property located in Maine, or does Maine law, as the law of the situs, control?
Conclusion
This case reaffirms the paramountcy of the law of the situs in Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliq
Legal Rule
The method for the foreclosure of a mortgage on land and the Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, q
Legal Analysis
The court's decision rested firmly on the established conflict of laws principle Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis au
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- The method for foreclosing a mortgage on real property is governed
