Case Citation
Legal Case Name

HITCHINS v. COMMISSIONER Case Brief

United States Tax Court1994
103 T.C. 711

Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs

Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.

Adaptive Case Views

Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.

Exam-Ready IRAC Format

We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.

Complex Cases, Clarified

We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.

Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis

General Brief
3 min read

tl;dr: An S-corp shareholder could not increase his basis by the S-corp’s assumption of a C-corp’s debt owed to him, because the shareholder made no new economic outlay to the S-corp and the original debtor remained liable.

Legal Significance: Reinforces the strict “actual economic outlay” and “direct indebtedness” requirements for S-corp shareholder basis under § 1366(d), emphasizing that mere assumption of debt without novation is insufficient.

HITCHINS v. COMMISSIONER Law School Study Guide

Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.

Case Facts & Court Holding

Key Facts & Case Background

Petitioner F. Howard Hitchins loaned $34,000 to Champaign Computer Co. (CCC), a C corporation in which he was a shareholder. CCC used these funds for operating expenses related to developing a chemical database. Subsequently, ChemMultiBase Co., Inc. (CMB), an S corporation in which petitioners were 50% shareholders, was formed. CCC invoiced CMB $65,645.39 for the database development. CMB paid this invoice partly by issuing a promissory note to CCC and partly by CMB agreeing to pay the $34,000 liability owed by CCC to petitioner. CMB recorded this assumption in its journal. However, CCC was not relieved of its liability to petitioner, and no note was executed between petitioner and CMB regarding the $34,000. Petitioners sought to include this $34,000 in their basis in CMB to deduct CMB’s losses under section 1366(d). The IRS disallowed this inclusion.

Court Holding & Legal Precedent

Issue: Does an S corporation’s assumption of a C corporation’s debt to a shareholder, where the C corporation remains liable, constitute “indebtedness of the S corporation to the shareholder” under section 1366(d)(1)(B) sufficient to increase the shareholder’s basis for deducting S corporation losses?

No. The S corporation’s assumption of the C corporation’s debt to the Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?

IRAC Legal Analysis

Premium Feature Unlock

Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades

IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.

Legal Issue

Does an S corporation’s assumption of a C corporation’s debt to a shareholder, where the C corporation remains liable, constitute “indebtedness of the S corporation to the shareholder” under section 1366(d)(1)(B) sufficient to increase the shareholder’s basis for deducting S corporation losses?

Conclusion

This case underscores the necessity for S corporation shareholders to make direct Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex

Legal Rule

Under I.R.C. § 1366(d)(1), an S corporation shareholder's ability to deduct their Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur

Legal Analysis

The Tax Court determined that for an S corporation shareholder to increase Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut

Flash-to-Full Case Opinions

Flash Summary

  • An S corp shareholder’s basis is not increased when the S
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?

The only bar I passed this year serves drinks.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+