Case Citation
Legal Case Name

IN RE CESSNA EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION Case Brief

Court of Appeals of Kansas2012
277 P.3d 1157 47 Kan.App.2d 275

Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs

Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.

Adaptive Case Views

Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.

Exam-Ready IRAC Format

We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.

Complex Cases, Clarified

We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.

Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis

General Brief
4 min read

tl;dr: A credit union sought a refund for sales tax paid on reimbursed travel expenses. The court held that reimbursements for expenses consumed by the seller, invoiced separately, are not part of the “gross receipts” from a sale and are therefore not subject to sales tax.

Legal Significance: Establishes that separately invoiced reimbursements for a seller’s costs are not part of the taxable “selling price” or “gross receipts” under Kansas sales tax law, distinguishing such reimbursements from the price of the goods or services actually sold.

IN RE CESSNA EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION Law School Study Guide

Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.

Case Facts & Court Holding

Key Facts & Case Background

Cessna Employees Credit Union (CECU) contracted with Jack Henry and Associates (JHA) for computer upgrade goods and services. The agreement stipulated that CECU would reimburse JHA for its employees’ travel expenses. JHA incurred these expenses, such as hotel stays, and paid the applicable sales tax to the vendors. JHA then invoiced CECU, separately listing the charge for its services and the charge for the travel expense reimbursement. However, JHA calculated and charged Kansas retailers’ sales tax on the entire invoice amount, including the reimbursed travel expenses which already had sales tax embedded in them. This resulted in a tax-on-tax situation. The parties stipulated that the travel expenses were “reimbursed” rather than sold and were consumed by JHA’s employees, not by CECU. After paying the tax, CECU filed a refund claim with the Kansas Court of Tax Appeals (COTA), arguing the reimbursements were not taxable. COTA denied the claim, reasoning the expenses were part of the total consideration for the transaction. CECU appealed.

Court Holding & Legal Precedent

Issue: Are separately invoiced reimbursements for a seller’s travel expenses, which were consumed by the seller, considered part of the “gross receipts” or “total selling price” of the primary goods and services sold, thereby making them subject to Kansas retailers’ sales tax?

No. The court reversed the Court of Tax Appeals, holding that the Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?

IRAC Legal Analysis

Premium Feature Unlock

Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades

IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.

Legal Issue

Are separately invoiced reimbursements for a seller’s travel expenses, which were consumed by the seller, considered part of the “gross receipts” or “total selling price” of the primary goods and services sold, thereby making them subject to Kansas retailers’ sales tax?

Conclusion

This case clarifies the scope of "gross receipts" for sales tax purposes, Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute

Legal Rule

Under the Kansas retailers' sales tax statutes, tax is imposed on the Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa

Legal Analysis

The court's analysis centered on the statutory definitions of "gross receipts" and Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis n

Flash-to-Full Case Opinions

Flash Summary

  • A vendor’s travel expenses that are separately invoiced to a customer
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?

Behind every great lawyer is an even greater paralegal who knows where everything is.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+