Hate ads? Verify for LSD+ → Learn More

Case Citation
Legal Case Name

In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served on Meserve, Mumper & Hughes. United States of America v. Janet Greeson's a Place for Us, Inc. Janet Greeson Janet Greeson's a Place for Us of Van Nuys, Inc. Janet Greeson's a Place for Us at Costa Mesa, Inc. And Janet Greeson's a Place for Us at Long Beach, Inc., Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants Case Brief

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit1995Docket #1049296
62 F.3d 1222

Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs

Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.

Adaptive Case Views

Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.

Exam-Ready IRAC Format

We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.

Complex Cases, Clarified

We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.

Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis

General Brief
3 min read

tl;dr: A grand jury subpoenaed documents sealed by a protective order from a prior civil case. The court held that a grand jury’s power to investigate crime always outweighs a civil protective order, establishing a per se rule that the subpoena must be enforced.

Legal Significance: This case establishes a per se rule in the Ninth Circuit that a grand jury subpoena takes precedence over a civil protective order, resolving a question of first impression by rejecting the Second Circuit’s balancing test in favor of the Fourth and Eleventh Circuits’ approach.

In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served on Meserve, Mumper & Hughes. United States of America v. Janet Greeson's a Place for Us, Inc. Janet Greeson Janet Greeson's a Place for Us of Van Nuys, Inc. Janet Greeson's a Place for Us at Costa Mesa, Inc. And Janet Greeson's a Place for Us at Long Beach, Inc., Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants Law School Study Guide

Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.

Case Facts & Court Holding

Key Facts & Case Background

A federal grand jury initiated a criminal investigation into Janet Greeson’s A Place For Us, Inc. (APFU) for alleged fraudulent billing. Previously, APFU had been sued in a civil action by insurance companies for the same conduct. That civil suit settled after extensive discovery, and as part of the settlement, the district court issued a protective order under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) sealing the discovery documents. The grand jury subsequently issued a subpoena to the law firm representing the civil plaintiffs, demanding production of all documents obtained during the civil discovery. APFU intervened in the criminal matter, moving to quash the subpoena on the grounds that the documents were shielded by the civil protective order. The district court denied the motion to quash, and APFU appealed, presenting a question of first impression for the Ninth Circuit.

Court Holding & Legal Precedent

Issue: Does a grand jury subpoena compelling the production of documents supersede a pre-existing civil protective order issued under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) that seals those same documents?

Yes. A grand jury subpoena prevails over a Rule 26(c) protective order. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitat

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?

IRAC Legal Analysis

Premium Feature Unlock

Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades

IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.

Legal Issue

Does a grand jury subpoena compelling the production of documents supersede a pre-existing civil protective order issued under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) that seals those same documents?

Conclusion

The decision solidifies the grand jury's broad investigative authority in the Ninth Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit

Legal Rule

A grand jury subpoena takes precedence over a validly issued Fed. R. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequa

Legal Analysis

The court adopted the per se rule of the Fourth and Eleventh Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem

Flash-to-Full Case Opinions

Flash Summary

  • A grand jury subpoena always trumps a civil protective order issued
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cill

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?

Hate ads? Verify for LSD+ → Learn More