Connection lost
Server error
INDIANA PUBLIC RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. SAIC, INC. Case Brief
Audio Insights: Learn Cases on The Go
Transform downtime into productive study time with our premium audio insights. Perfect for commutes, workouts, or visual breaks from reading.
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A government contractor failed to disclose a massive, multi-million dollar fraud scheme in its SEC filings. The Second Circuit held that plaintiffs plausibly alleged securities fraud, reviving claims based on the company’s failure to disclose the known risks in its Form 10-K.
Legal Significance: This case establishes that Item 303 of Regulation S-K requires a plaintiff to plead a defendant’s actual knowledge of a trend or uncertainty. It also clarifies that a “reasonable possibility” of loss under FAS 5 can be triggered by a potential claimant’s manifest awareness.
INDIANA PUBLIC RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. SAIC, INC. Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
SAIC, Inc., a major government contractor, was the prime contractor for New York City’s “CityTime” project. Unbeknownst to the public, SAIC’s program manager, Gerard Denault, orchestrated a massive kickback scheme that inflated the project’s cost from an initial budget of $63 million to over $600 million. By late 2010, the scheme began to unravel. The U.S. Attorney’s office launched a criminal investigation, and NYC’s mayor announced a review of all payments to SAIC with the goal of recovery. SAIC conducted its own internal investigation, which reported on Denault’s improper practices on March 9, 2011. Despite being aware of the criminal investigation, the mayor’s statements, and its own internal findings, SAIC filed its annual Form 10-K on March 25, 2011, without disclosing the potential liability or the known uncertainty surrounding the CityTime project. In June 2011, SAIC finally disclosed the investigation, and its stock price subsequently fell. SAIC ultimately entered into a deferred prosecution agreement, agreeing to pay the City approximately $500.4 million.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Did the plaintiffs plausibly allege that the defendant’s failure to disclose the risks associated with the CityTime fraud in its March 2011 Form 10-K constituted a material omission made with the requisite scienter to state a claim for securities fraud under Section 10(b)?
Yes. The court vacated the dismissal of claims related to the March Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Did the plaintiffs plausibly allege that the defendant’s failure to disclose the risks associated with the CityTime fraud in its March 2011 Form 10-K constituted a material omission made with the requisite scienter to state a claim for securities fraud under Section 10(b)?
Conclusion
This decision provides key guidance on securities fraud pleading standards, clarifying that Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip
Legal Rule
To state a claim under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5, a plaintiff Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipis
Legal Analysis
The court's analysis focused on the duties to disclose under FAS 5 Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea com
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- Item 303 requires actual knowledge. To state a claim for failure