Connection lost
Server error
Keck v. Graham Hotel Systems, Inc. Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: An African American couple sued a hotel for race discrimination after repeated, unsuccessful attempts to book their wedding reception. The appellate court reversed summary judgment for the hotel, finding triable issues of fact.
Legal Significance: This case clarifies the application of the McDonnell Douglas framework to § 1981 claims in commercial establishments, particularly the “markedly hostile” conduct standard for establishing a prima facie case of discrimination and the evaluation of pretext.
Keck v. Graham Hotel Systems, Inc. Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Plaintiffs, Alfreda and Devon Keck, an African American couple, sought to host their wedding reception at the defendant’s hotel. Over approximately three months in 2004, they made numerous attempts to contract with the hotel, including seven walk-in visits, multiple telephone messages, two inquiry forms, and two ten-day holds on their desired date. On three occasions, they offered in-person to pay the $1,200 deposit and sign a contract. Despite these efforts, they were never able to speak with the Wedding Specialist or finalize arrangements. The hotel cited a recent name change (though ownership, management, and staffing remained unchanged), a temporary vacancy in the Wedding Specialist position, and the unscheduled nature of the plaintiffs’ visits as reasons for the difficulties. Subsequent investigation by the Fair Housing Center using testers indicated that African American testers encountered more obstacles and less favorable treatment than Caucasian testers when inquiring about wedding receptions at the hotel in three out of four instances. The District Court granted summary judgment for the defendant, finding the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case of discrimination and that the hotel offered legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for its actions.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Did the District Court err in granting summary judgment for the defendant hotel by finding that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case of race discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and that no genuine issue of material fact existed as to whether the hotel’s proffered reasons for its conduct were pretextual?
Yes, the Court of Appeals reversed the District Court’s grant of summary Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit e
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Did the District Court err in granting summary judgment for the defendant hotel by finding that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case of race discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and that no genuine issue of material fact existed as to whether the hotel’s proffered reasons for its conduct were pretextual?
Conclusion
The case underscores that persistent, unexplained failure by a commercial establishment to Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Dui
Legal Rule
Under the modified *McDonnell Douglas* framework for § 1981 commercial establishment claims, Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet,
Legal Analysis
The Court of Appeals, reviewing de novo, determined that the District Court Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliq
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- The Sixth Circuit reversed summary judgment for a hotel in a