Connection lost
Server error
Kraft, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: The FTC found Kraft’s cheese ads deceptively implied false calcium claims. The court upheld the FTC’s order, affirming that an agency can find an ad misleading based on its own analysis without consumer surveys, so long as the implied claim is reasonably clear.
Legal Significance: This case affirms the FTC’s authority to find advertisements implicitly deceptive without extrinsic evidence, provided the implied claim is reasonably clear from the ad’s face. It reinforces a deferential standard of review for the FTC’s factual findings, even when commercial speech is implicated.
Kraft, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Kraft, Inc. launched an advertising campaign for its Kraft Singles cheese slices, known as the “Five Ounces of Milk” campaign. The ads stated that each slice was made from five ounces of milk and was high in calcium. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed a complaint, alleging the ads made two false implied claims: (1) that a slice of Singles contains the same amount of calcium as five ounces of milk (the “milk equivalency” claim), and (2) that Singles contain more calcium than most imitation cheese slices (the “imitation superiority” claim). In reality, about 30% of the milk’s calcium is lost during processing, and most imitation slices are fortified to contain a similar amount of calcium as Singles. The FTC, relying primarily on its own interpretation of the ads’ “overall net impression” rather than extrinsic consumer survey evidence, found the ads deceptive. It issued a broad cease and desist order covering all of Kraft’s cheese products. Kraft petitioned for review, arguing the FTC was required to use extrinsic evidence and that its findings were not supported by substantial evidence.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: May the Federal Trade Commission, without relying on extrinsic evidence such as consumer surveys, determine that an advertisement makes a deceptive implied claim that is reasonably clear from the face of the advertisement?
Yes. The court affirmed the FTC’s order, holding that the Commission is Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse ci
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
May the Federal Trade Commission, without relying on extrinsic evidence such as consumer surveys, determine that an advertisement makes a deceptive implied claim that is reasonably clear from the face of the advertisement?
Conclusion
The case solidifies the FTC's authority and procedural latitude in policing deceptive Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute ir
Legal Rule
The Federal Trade Commission may rely on its own reasoned analysis to Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fug
Legal Analysis
The Seventh Circuit rejected Kraft's argument for a de novo standard of Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehende
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- The FTC can find an advertisement makes a misleading implied claim
