Connection lost
Server error
KREYER v. DRISCOLL Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A builder failed to finish a house but sued for the contract price. The court denied recovery on the contract under the substantial performance doctrine but awarded payment for the benefit conferred on the owner under a quantum meruit theory to prevent unjust enrichment.
Legal Significance: Clarifies the distinction between substantial performance and quantum meruit. A contractor who has not substantially performed may still recover in restitution for the net benefit conferred upon the owner, preventing the owner’s unjust enrichment.
KREYER v. DRISCOLL Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Plaintiff Kreyer, a contractor, agreed to build a house for the defendants, the Driscolls. The contract required Kreyer to submit lien waivers from subcontractors to receive installment payments. Kreyer submitted some inaccurate waivers and misapplied some funds. Before the project was finished, Kreyer ceased work, leaving a substantial amount of the house incomplete. The unfinished work included approximately half of the plumbing, electrical, heating, and tile work, all of the linoleum, and a quarter of the decorating, with a total completion cost of $4,650. The Driscolls had to take over and finish the construction themselves. Kreyer sued to recover the unpaid balance of the contract price, alleging he had substantially performed. The trial court found for Kreyer on a theory of substantial performance, awarding him the contract price minus the Driscolls’ cost to complete the work. The Driscolls appealed, arguing Kreyer had not substantially performed.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: May a building contractor who has failed to substantially perform a construction contract nevertheless recover from the owner for the value of the work completed?
Yes. The court held that while the contractor had not substantially performed Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea comm
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
May a building contractor who has failed to substantially perform a construction contract nevertheless recover from the owner for the value of the work completed?
Conclusion
This case establishes that even a contractor in material breach may have Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor i
Legal Rule
A contractor who has not substantially performed a building contract cannot recover Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in
Legal Analysis
The court first rejected the trial court's finding of substantial performance. It Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariat
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A contractor who leaves significant work unfinished (e.g., half the plumbing