Connection lost
Server error
LAKOTA GIRL SCOUT C., INC. v. HAVEY FUND-RAIS. MAN., INC. Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A professional fundraiser breached its contract with the Girl Scouts. The court allowed the Girl Scouts to recover lost profits from the failed campaign, finding that damages did not need to be calculated with mathematical certainty and could be proven through expert testimony.
Legal Significance: Establishes that lost profits can be recovered for breach of contract even for a new or one-time venture, provided there is a rational basis for computation, such as expert testimony. This relaxes the traditional “new business rule” which often bars recovery for speculative damages.
LAKOTA GIRL SCOUT C., INC. v. HAVEY FUND-RAIS. MAN., INC. Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Lakota Girl Scout Council, Inc. (Plaintiff) contracted with Havey Fund-Raising Management, Inc. (Defendant) for professional services to help raise $345,000 for a campsite development project. The defendant, after conducting its own feasibility study, represented that this goal was achievable. The contract stipulated a fee of $28,000 for the defendant’s services but did not guarantee that any funds would be raised. The defendant subsequently breached the contract by providing inadequate supervision and assistance, including shifting personnel and failing to provide follow-up on collections. The campaign was disorganized and fell far short of its goal, grossing only $88,842. The plaintiff sued for breach of contract, seeking damages for lost profits. At trial, the plaintiff presented expert testimony from the campaign’s chairman and a former employee of the defendant, who opined that the fundraising goal was realistic and would have been met had the defendant performed its contractual obligations. The jury awarded the plaintiff $35,000. The defendant appealed, arguing that lost profits were too speculative to be awarded for a one-time fundraising drive, which it characterized as a “new business.”
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Can a plaintiff recover damages for lost profits resulting from a breached contract for a one-time fundraising venture when the amount of loss is not certain but can be reasonably estimated through expert testimony?
Yes. The court affirmed the award of lost profits, holding that where Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in vol
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Can a plaintiff recover damages for lost profits resulting from a breached contract for a one-time fundraising venture when the amount of loss is not certain but can be reasonably estimated through expert testimony?
Conclusion
This case demonstrates a flexible judicial approach to proving damages for lost Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in re
Legal Rule
Under Iowa law, lost profits are recoverable for a breach of contract Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatu
Legal Analysis
The court applied a three-part test for lost profits under Iowa law, Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A court can exercise personal jurisdiction over a non-resident shareholder by