Connection lost
Server error
Matter of Cooperman Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: The court held that special nonrefundable retainer fee agreements are per se unethical and violate public policy because they impermissibly burden a client’s absolute right to discharge their attorney and an attorney’s duty to refund unearned fees.
Legal Significance: This case established that special nonrefundable retainer agreements are unenforceable and subject attorneys to discipline, as they clash with the client’s unfettered right to terminate the attorney-client relationship and the attorney’s ethical obligations.
Matter of Cooperman Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Attorney Cooperman repeatedly used special nonrefundable retainer fee agreements with clients in criminal and probate matters. These agreements stipulated that the initial fee was nonrefundable, irrespective of services rendered or if the client discharged Cooperman. For instance, one agreement stated a $15,000 minimum fee was “not refundable for any reason whatsoever once I file a notice of appearance.” Another specified a $5,000 fee was “non-refundable even if you decide prior to my completion of the investigation that you wish to discontinue the use of my services.” Despite prior warnings from the Grievance Committee against such agreements, Cooperman persisted. When discharged by clients, he refused to refund any portion of the fees, citing the nonrefundable nature of the agreements. The Grievance Committee initiated disciplinary proceedings, alleging violations including failure to refund unearned fees (DR 2-110 [A] [3]), chilling the client’s right to discharge counsel (DR 2-110 [B] [4]), and charging excessive fees (DR 2-106 [A]). The Appellate Division found the agreements per se violative of public policy and suspended Cooperman.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Are special nonrefundable retainer fee agreements, which provide for a fee paid in advance that is nonrefundable regardless of whether any professional services are actually rendered, per se violative of public policy and the Code of Professional Responsibility?
Yes. The court affirmed the Appellate Division’s order, holding that special nonrefundable Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in v
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Are special nonrefundable retainer fee agreements, which provide for a fee paid in advance that is nonrefundable regardless of whether any professional services are actually rendered, per se violative of public policy and the Code of Professional Responsibility?
Conclusion
This decision firmly establishes that special nonrefundable retainer agreements are unethical and Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequa
Legal Rule
Special nonrefundable retainer fee agreements are per se violative of public policy Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur
Legal Analysis
The court emphasized the unique fiduciary nature of the attorney-client relationship, which Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo co
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- Special nonrefundable retainer fee agreements are per se unethical and violate