Connection lost
Server error
McKinnon v. Benedict Case Brief
Audio Insights: Learn Cases on The Go
Transform downtime into productive study time with our premium audio insights. Perfect for commutes, workouts, or visual breaks from reading.
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A landowner sought an injunction to enforce a 25-year land-use restriction against his neighbor. The court refused, finding the agreement unconscionable because the neighbor received grossly inadequate consideration in exchange for accepting a severe and oppressive burden on his property.
Legal Significance: This case establishes that a court of equity will not grant specific performance of a contract, even if legally valid, where the consideration is so grossly inadequate and the terms so oppressive as to render the bargain unconscionable and shock the conscience of the court.
McKinnon v. Benedict Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
The plaintiffs, the McKinnons, owned a summer home adjacent to a resort property. The defendants, the Benedicts, sought to purchase the resort but needed an additional $5,000 to close the transaction. McKinnon agreed to lend the Benedicts the $5,000, interest-free, for seven months. In exchange, the Benedicts signed a letter agreement imposing significant restrictions on their property for 25 years. The agreement prohibited the construction of any improvements closer to the McKinnon property than the existing buildings and specifically forbade the operation of a trailer park or campsite. McKinnon also made vague promises to help generate business for the resort, which resulted in minimal benefit. Facing financial difficulties in operating the resort, the Benedicts began developing a campsite and trailer park on their land to generate income. The McKinnons filed suit, seeking an injunction to enforce the restrictive agreement. The trial court granted the injunction, and the Benedicts appealed.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Will a court of equity grant an injunction to enforce a restrictive agreement where the consideration for the promise is grossly inadequate and enforcement would impose a disproportionate and oppressive hardship on the promisor?
No. The judgment granting the injunction is reversed. The restrictive agreement is Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderi
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Will a court of equity grant an injunction to enforce a restrictive agreement where the consideration for the promise is grossly inadequate and enforcement would impose a disproportionate and oppressive hardship on the promisor?
Conclusion
This case is a classic illustration of the equitable defense of unconscionability, Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, qu
Legal Rule
A court of equity exercises sound discretion in granting injunctive relief and Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in repr
Legal Analysis
The Wisconsin Supreme Court grounded its decision in fundamental principles of equity, Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui offic
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A court of equity will not grant an injunction to enforce