Connection lost
Server error
Morehead v. New York Ex Rel. Tipaldo Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: The Supreme Court struck down a New York minimum wage law for women, holding that it violated the “liberty of contract” protected by the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause, reaffirming the precedent set in Adkins v. Children’s Hospital.
Legal Significance: This case represents the high-water mark of the Lochner era’s substantive due process doctrine protecting freedom of contract from economic regulation. It was famously overruled just one year later in West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish.
Morehead v. New York Ex Rel. Tipaldo Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
New York enacted a minimum wage law applicable to adult women and minors, authorizing a state commissioner to establish “minimum fair wage rates.” The statute defined an “oppressive and unreasonable wage” as one that was “both less than the fair and reasonable value of the services rendered and less than sufficient to meet the minimum cost of living necessary for health.” Joseph Tipaldo, the manager of a laundry, was indicted for violating a mandatory order under the law by paying his adult female employees less than the prescribed minimum wage. Tipaldo filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, arguing the statute was repugnant to the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because it unconstitutionally interfered with his and his employees’ freedom of contract. The New York Court of Appeals agreed, finding the law materially indistinguishable from the District of Columbia statute struck down by the Supreme Court in Adkins v. Children’s Hospital. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does a state law authorizing the establishment of minimum wages for adult women, based on both the fair value of services and the minimum cost of living, violate the liberty of contract protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?
Yes. The Court affirmed the judgment of the New York Court of Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does a state law authorizing the establishment of minimum wages for adult women, based on both the fair value of services and the minimum cost of living, violate the liberty of contract protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?
Conclusion
This decision marked the final reaffirmation of the *Lochner* era's "liberty of Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo conseq
Legal Rule
The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment protects freedom of contract, Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit
Legal Analysis
The majority opinion, authored by Justice Butler, strictly adhered to the precedent Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla par
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- Held that a New York minimum wage law for women violated