Connection lost
Server error
National Labor Relations Board v. Burns International Security Services, Inc. Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A company that took over a service contract and hired a majority of the predecessor’s unionized employees was required to bargain with the union, but was not automatically bound by the predecessor’s collective bargaining agreement.
Legal Significance: This case established the foundational successorship doctrine in labor law, bifurcating the successor’s obligations: the duty to bargain with the incumbent union is imposed by law, but assumption of the predecessor’s contract is not.
National Labor Relations Board v. Burns International Security Services, Inc. Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Wackenhut Corp. provided security services for Lockheed and had a three-year collective bargaining agreement (CBA) with the United Plant Guard Workers of America (UPG), which had been recently certified by the NLRB as the employees’ representative. When the service contract expired, Burns International Security Services, Inc. outbid Wackenhut for the Lockheed contract. Burns was aware of the union’s certification and the existing CBA. Burns hired 42 guards to service the contract, 27 of whom were former Wackenhut employees, thus constituting a majority of the new workforce. Burns refused to recognize UPG or honor the terms of the Wackenhut-UPG CBA. Instead, Burns recognized a rival union. The UPG filed an unfair labor practice charge. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) found that Burns was a successor employer and ordered it to bargain with UPG and to honor the substantive terms of the pre-existing CBA.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does a successor employer that hires a majority of its predecessor’s employees have a duty under the National Labor Relations Act to bargain with the incumbent union and to honor the substantive terms of the predecessor’s collective bargaining agreement?
Yes, as to the duty to bargain; no, as to the duty Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does a successor employer that hires a majority of its predecessor’s employees have a duty under the National Labor Relations Act to bargain with the incumbent union and to honor the substantive terms of the predecessor’s collective bargaining agreement?
Conclusion
This landmark decision defines the modern successorship doctrine, balancing the goals of Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nost
Legal Rule
A successor employer is obligated to bargain with the incumbent union representing Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatu
Legal Analysis
The Court's analysis created a two-part framework for successorship. First, it affirmed Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A successor employer has a duty to bargain with the predecessor’s