Connection lost
Server error
OWENS v. CONTIGROUP COMPANIES, INC. Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: Hog farm operators appealed a nuisance verdict, arguing non-economic damages were not recoverable for farmland. The court affirmed, holding loss of use and enjoyment damages are available for temporary nuisance affecting both residential and business (farm) property.
Legal Significance: Establishes that non-economic damages for loss of use and enjoyment in temporary nuisance cases are recoverable for property used for business purposes (e.g., farmland), not solely for residential property, even without proof of direct economic loss to the business itself.
OWENS v. CONTIGROUP COMPANIES, INC. Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Respondents, fifteen individuals owning residential and farm properties in Gentry County, Missouri, sued ContiGroup Companies, Inc. (PSF) for temporary nuisance caused by PSF’s large-scale hog farming operations. The alleged nuisance stemmed from ill-smelling odors and other emissions emanating from the hog farms between 1999 and 2010, substantially impairing Respondents’ use and enjoyment of their properties. Respondents sought compensatory damages for this loss of use and enjoyment, not for diminution in property value. After a jury trial, Respondents were awarded significant compensatory damages. PSF appealed, arguing, inter alia, that Respondents failed to make a submissible case for damages related to their farmlands because they offered no evidence of economic damages specific to these “business” properties. PSF also challenged jury instructions, consolidation of claims, admission of expert testimony, and the excessiveness of the damage awards.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does Missouri law permit recovery of non-economic compensatory damages for the loss of use and enjoyment of property used for business purposes (farmland) in a temporary nuisance action, absent proof of specific economic loss to that business property?
Yes, Missouri law allows property owners to recover non-economic compensatory damages for Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo cons
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does Missouri law permit recovery of non-economic compensatory damages for the loss of use and enjoyment of property used for business purposes (farmland) in a temporary nuisance action, absent proof of specific economic loss to that business property?
Conclusion
This case clarifies that in Missouri, temporary nuisance claims can support awards Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequa
Legal Rule
The measure of damages for a temporary nuisance includes the decrease in Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, con
Legal Analysis
The court rejected PSF's contention that a rigid distinction exists between residential Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- In a temporary nuisance case, Missouri law allows recovery of non-economic