Connection lost
Server error
Petition of Skeen Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A family was denied a permit for a home babysitting service despite meeting all legal requirements under the city’s zoning ordinance. The court reversed, holding that because the applicants met the specified criteria for a “special exception,” they were entitled to the permit, and neighbor opposition was an improper basis for denial.
Legal Significance: This case establishes that an applicant who meets all enumerated criteria for a special exception (or conditional use) in a zoning ordinance has a right to the permit. A zoning board cannot deny the permit based on extraneous factors like generalized neighborhood opposition.
Petition of Skeen Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
G. Samuel and Jeanne C. Skeen sought to operate a state-licensed babysitting service from their home, which was located in an R-1 single-family residence district in the City of Bluefield. The city’s zoning ordinance prohibits businesses in R-1 districts but allows for “special exceptions,” including a “home occupation.” The ordinance defined a “home occupation” by six specific criteria: (a) no non-family employees; (b) use is subordinate to residential use and occupies less than 25% of the floor area; (c) no change to the building’s exterior; (d) not conducted in an accessory building; (e) no generation of excess traffic or need for parking; and (f) no creation of nuisances like noise or fumes. The Skeens applied for a special exception permit, demonstrating that their proposed service complied with all six criteria. The Zoning Board of Adjustment held a hearing where neighboring landowners expressed opposition. The Board denied the application, not for failure to meet the ordinance’s criteria, but based on the neighbors’ opposition. The circuit court affirmed the Board’s decision, and the Skeens appealed.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Did the Zoning Board of Adjustment err by denying a special exception permit for a home occupation when the applicants met all the specific requirements set forth in the zoning ordinance, but the denial was based on neighborhood opposition?
Yes. The Board’s denial of the special exception permit was reversed. Because Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat null
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Did the Zoning Board of Adjustment err by denying a special exception permit for a home occupation when the applicants met all the specific requirements set forth in the zoning ordinance, but the denial was based on neighborhood opposition?
Conclusion
This case solidifies the rule that a zoning board's authority in special Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex e
Legal Rule
A special exception or conditional use, unlike a variance, does not involve Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cill
Legal Analysis
The court's analysis centered on the critical distinction between a "special exception" Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A special exception (or conditional use) is not a deviation from