Connection lost
Server error
RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Cmty. Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: The Supreme Court held that while the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) can punish foreign criminal conduct, its private civil remedy is only available to plaintiffs who suffer a domestic injury to their business or property.
Legal Significance: This case established that the presumption against extraterritoriality applies separately to a statute’s substantive prohibitions and its private right of action. It also clarified the two-step framework for analyzing a federal statute’s geographic scope, cementing the analysis from Morrison v. National Australia Bank.
RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Cmty. Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
The European Community and 26 of its member states (Respondents) sued RJR Nabisco, Inc. (RJR), a U.S. corporation, and its related entities under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). Respondents alleged that RJR orchestrated a global money-laundering scheme from its U.S. headquarters. The scheme allegedly involved drug traffickers and money brokers who used illicit funds to purchase large quantities of RJR cigarettes for smuggling into Europe. The complaint asserted that RJR engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity, including predicate acts of money laundering, material support to terrorist organizations, mail fraud, and wire fraud. Some of these alleged predicate acts occurred within the United States, while others occurred abroad. Respondents claimed these RICO violations caused them various injuries, all of which were suffered in Europe. These injuries included competitive harm to state-owned businesses, lost tax revenue from black-market sales, and increased law enforcement costs. RJR moved to dismiss, arguing that RICO does not apply extraterritorially to foreign conduct or foreign injuries. The Second Circuit reinstated the claims, holding that RICO applies extraterritorially to the extent its underlying predicate statutes do, and that a private plaintiff could recover for foreign injuries proximately caused by such violations.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) apply to foreign conduct, and if so, does its private right of action permit recovery for injuries suffered outside the United States?
Yes, RICO’s substantive prohibitions in 18 U.S.C. § 1962 apply extraterritorially, but Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fug
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) apply to foreign conduct, and if so, does its private right of action permit recovery for injuries suffered outside the United States?
Conclusion
The decision solidifies the modern two-step framework for extraterritoriality and creates a Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim venia
Legal Rule
Courts must apply a two-step framework to determine a statute's extraterritorial reach: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deseru
Legal Analysis
The Court bifurcated its extraterritoriality analysis, examining RICO's substantive prohibitions (§ 1962) Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, s
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- RICO’s substantive prohibitions (§ 1962) can apply extraterritorially, but only if
