Connection lost
Server error
Robert Wilhoit v. Peoples Life Insurance Company, and Thomas J. Owens, and Lee C. Emmelman, Adm., Etc., Intervenor-Appellant Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A life insurance beneficiary received policy proceeds, then deposited them back with the insurer under a new agreement naming a third party to receive the funds upon her death. The court held this was an invalid testamentary gift, not a contract, because she retained full control.
Legal Significance: An agreement creating a pay-on-death provision is an invalid testamentary disposition, not a valid third-party beneficiary contract, if the owner retains complete control and the beneficiary acquires no present interest. Such transfers must comply with the Statute of Wills.
Robert Wilhoit v. Peoples Life Insurance Company, and Thomas J. Owens, and Lee C. Emmelman, Adm., Etc., Intervenor-Appellant Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Sarah Louise Wilhoit was the beneficiary of her deceased husband’s life insurance policy. On October 22, 1930, she received the policy proceeds of $4,749, surrendering the policy and signing a receipt for full payment, which terminated the original insurance contract. The policy had contained an ‘Investment’ option allowing the proceeds to be left on deposit, but Mrs. Wilhoit did not exercise it. Twenty-three days later, she entered into a new, separate agreement with the insurance company to deposit the same amount of money. The terms of this new agreement differed from the policy’s original option, notably granting her the right to withdraw the principal on demand. The agreement stipulated, ‘In the event of my death, while any part of this trust fund is still in existence, the full amount… shall be immediately payable to Robert G. Owens.’ Owens, her brother, predeceased Mrs. Wilhoit. Upon Mrs. Wilhoit’s death, her will bequeathed the funds to the plaintiff, Robert Wilhoit. The administrator of Owens’s estate intervened, claiming the funds based on the deposit agreement. The district court granted summary judgment for the plaintiff.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Did the deposit agreement, which gave the depositor full control over the funds during her life and designated a third party to receive them upon her death, constitute a valid inter vivos transfer or an invalid testamentary disposition that failed to comply with the Statute of Wills?
The judgment is affirmed. The agreement was an invalid testamentary disposition. Because Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proide
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Did the deposit agreement, which gave the depositor full control over the funds during her life and designated a third party to receive them upon her death, constitute a valid inter vivos transfer or an invalid testamentary disposition that failed to comply with the Statute of Wills?
Conclusion
This case illustrates the critical distinction between a valid pay-on-death provision within Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute ir
Legal Rule
A disposition of property that is intended to take effect only upon Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in repre
Legal Analysis
The court first determined that the agreement in question was not an Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nis
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- An agreement between a beneficiary and an insurer made after a