Hate ads? Verify for LSD+ → Learn More

Case Citation
Legal Case Name

Rockford Map Publishers, Inc. v. Directory Service Company of Colorado, Inc. And Frances A. Anderson Case Brief

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit1985Docket #499620
768 F.2d 145 226 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 1025 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 20480

Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs

Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.

Adaptive Case Views

Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.

Exam-Ready IRAC Format

We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.

Complex Cases, Clarified

We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.

Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis

General Brief
3 min read

tl;dr: A map publisher sued a competitor who used its copyrighted plat maps as a starting template to create a new map. The court held that using the copyrighted arrangement as a base, even with subsequent verification and correction, constituted copyright infringement.

Legal Significance: This case clarifies that copyright in a factual compilation protects the author’s original arrangement and presentation, not the labor invested. A competitor infringes by copying that arrangement as a template, rather than creating a work independently from the original source data.

Rockford Map Publishers, Inc. v. Directory Service Company of Colorado, Inc. And Frances A. Anderson Law School Study Guide

Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.

Case Facts & Court Holding

Key Facts & Case Background

Rockford Map Publishers, Inc. (Plaintiff) creates and sells copyrighted plat maps, which visually represent land ownership information derived from public records. This process involves researching deeds and translating textual legal descriptions into a pictorial format. Directory Service Company of Colorado, Inc. (Defendant) also produces plat maps. To create a map of Ford County, Directory Service enlarged Rockford’s copyrighted map and provided it to an agent to use as a “worksheet” or “base.” The agent’s task was to verify the information against public records, placing a green check on correct parcels and making corrections in red on incorrect ones. Rockford had embedded fictitious middle initials in its maps as copyright traps, and Directory Service’s maps replicated 54 of the 56 traps, proving that Rockford’s map was copied. The district court found for Rockford, enjoining further publication and awarding damages and attorneys’ fees.

Court Holding & Legal Precedent

Issue: Does a compiler of a factual work infringe a prior copyrighted work by using it as a base template for verification and correction, rather than conducting its own independent research and arrangement from the source materials?

Yes. The court affirmed the finding of copyright infringement, holding that Directory Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mol

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?

IRAC Legal Analysis

Premium Feature Unlock

Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades

IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.

Legal Issue

Does a compiler of a factual work infringe a prior copyrighted work by using it as a base template for verification and correction, rather than conducting its own independent research and arrangement from the source materials?

Conclusion

The case stands as a key precedent establishing that copyright protects the Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nost

Legal Rule

Under 17 U.S.C. § 103, the copyright in a factual compilation extends Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse ci

Legal Analysis

The court, through Judge Easterbrook, held that Rockford's plat maps were copyrightable Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute

Flash-to-Full Case Opinions

Flash Summary

  • Copyright protects the original arrangement and presentation of facts in a
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui of

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?

Hate ads? Verify for LSD+ → Learn More