Connection lost
Server error
STATE v. ULIBARRI Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: Police executed a search warrant, waiting only 10-12 seconds after knocking and announcing before forcibly entering a home. The court held this wait was unreasonable because officers knew the only likely occupant was an elderly man, and suppressed the resulting evidence.
Legal Significance: The reasonableness of the wait time for the knock-and-announce rule is determined by the totality of the circumstances, not a “customary” or bright-line period. Officers must consider factors like the dwelling’s size and the likely occupants’ characteristics before forcing entry.
STATE v. ULIBARRI Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Police obtained a search warrant for a home where the defendant, Kenneth Ulibarri, resided with his 79-year-old grandfather, Mr. Roybal. The warrant was part of a drug trafficking investigation targeting Ulibarri and others. At approximately 10:00 p.m., a team of eight officers went to execute the warrant. The lead officer was aware that Ulibarri and the other suspects had already been arrested and were not in the home. The officers knocked and announced their presence. After waiting ten to twelve seconds and hearing no response, the lead officer ordered a forced entry with a battering ram. The officer testified that a ten-second wait was “customary.” As the door was breached, it struck Mr. Roybal, who was walking to answer it, knocking him to the ground and causing injury. Mr. Roybal testified it took him ten seconds or less to get from his recliner to the door. The trial court denied Ulibarri’s motion to suppress the evidence found during the search, concluding the wait time was reasonable. Ulibarri entered a conditional guilty plea, reserving his right to appeal the denial of his motion.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Was a ten-to-twelve-second wait after knocking and announcing before forcibly entering a home to execute a search warrant constitutionally reasonable when officers knew the suspect was not present and the only likely occupant was an elderly man?
No. The ten-to-twelve-second wait was unreasonable under the totality of the circumstances. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commod
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Was a ten-to-twelve-second wait after knocking and announcing before forcibly entering a home to execute a search warrant constitutionally reasonable when officers knew the suspect was not present and the only likely occupant was an elderly man?
Conclusion
This case establishes that a formulaic or "customary" wait time for a Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitati
Legal Rule
Under the Fourth Amendment and the New Mexico Constitution, officers executing a Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserun
Legal Analysis
The court determined that the reasonableness of the wait time before a Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetu
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A 10-12 second wait before a forced entry was unreasonable when