Connection lost
Server error
Textile Workers Union v. Darlington Manufacturing Co. Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: An employer closed a mill after a union victory. The Court held that closing an entire business for anti-union reasons is lawful, but a partial closing of an integrated enterprise intended to chill unionism in remaining facilities is an unfair labor practice.
Legal Significance: This case established the “Darlington doctrine”: an employer has an absolute right to terminate its entire business for any reason, but a partial closing violates the NLRA if motivated by a purpose to chill unionism in the employer’s remaining operations.
Textile Workers Union v. Darlington Manufacturing Co. Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Darlington Manufacturing Co. operated a single textile mill. A majority of its stock was controlled by the Milliken family through Deering Milliken, an entity that operated 27 mills in total. After the Textile Workers Union won a representation election at the Darlington mill, the company’s president, Roger Milliken, who harbored significant anti-union animus, orchestrated a vote by the board of directors to liquidate the corporation. The plant was permanently closed, and its assets were sold piecemeal. The union filed an unfair labor practice charge with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), alleging the closing violated §§ 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(3) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The NLRB found for the union, concluding that Darlington was part of a single integrated enterprise (Deering Milliken) and that the closing was an unlawful discriminatory act. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that an employer has an absolute right to close its business for any reason.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does an employer commit an unfair labor practice under the National Labor Relations Act by closing its business, either in whole or in part, due to anti-union animus?
The Court held that while an employer may terminate its entire business Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Exce
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does an employer commit an unfair labor practice under the National Labor Relations Act by closing its business, either in whole or in part, due to anti-union animus?
Conclusion
This landmark decision defines the boundary between an employer's absolute right to Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat
Legal Rule
An employer has an absolute right to terminate its entire business for Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in
Legal Analysis
The Court, in an opinion by Justice Harlan, drew a sharp distinction Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- An employer has an absolute right to close its entire business