Connection lost
Server error
Top Rank, Inc. v. Ortiz (In Re Ortiz) Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A boxer filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, and his promotional contract was rejected. The court held that rejection is a breach, not a termination, of the contract. The promoter’s right to an injunction survives unless it is a dischargeable “claim,” a determination requiring further state law analysis.
Legal Significance: This case clarifies that under 11 U.S.C. § 365, rejection of an executory contract is a breach, not a termination. A non-debtor’s right to equitable relief survives unless it constitutes a dischargeable “claim” under § 101(5)(B), which requires a separate, state-law-based inquiry.
Top Rank, Inc. v. Ortiz (In Re Ortiz) Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Victor Ortiz, a professional boxer, entered into a five-year exclusive promotional agreement with Top Rank, Inc. The contract was an executory personal services contract. Ortiz subsequently filed a voluntary Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition. The bankruptcy trustee did not assume the promotional agreement within the 60-day period prescribed by 11 U.S.C. § 365(d)(1), resulting in the contract being “deemed rejected.” Ortiz then sought a declaratory judgment that the rejection terminated all his obligations under the contract, freeing him to sign with another promoter. Top Rank countered that rejection constituted only a breach, not a termination, and that its right to enforce the contract’s exclusivity provision via an injunction survived the bankruptcy. The bankruptcy court granted summary judgment for Ortiz, holding that rejection terminated the contract and limited Top Rank’s remedy to a monetary claim against the estate. In the alternative, the bankruptcy court found the exclusivity provision unenforceable under Nevada law. Top Rank appealed to the district court.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does the rejection of a personal services executory contract under 11 U.S.C. § 365 automatically terminate the contract and extinguish the non-debtor party’s right to seek equitable relief against the debtor?
Reversed and remanded. The bankruptcy court erred in holding that rejection of Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does the rejection of a personal services executory contract under 11 U.S.C. § 365 automatically terminate the contract and extinguish the non-debtor party’s right to seek equitable relief against the debtor?
Conclusion
This decision reinforces the majority view that contract rejection in bankruptcy is Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamc
Legal Rule
The rejection of an executory contract under 11 U.S.C. § 365(g) constitutes Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proi
Legal Analysis
The district court reversed the bankruptcy court on two grounds. First, it Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in cu
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- Rejection of an executory contract under 11 U.S.C. § 365 is