Case Citation
Legal Case Name

TORRES v. BACARDI GLOBAL BRANDS PROMOTIONS, INC. Case Brief

United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division2007
482 F.Supp.2d 1379 Labor & Employment Law Civil Procedure

Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs

Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.

Adaptive Case Views

Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.

Exam-Ready IRAC Format

We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.

Complex Cases, Clarified

We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.

Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis

General Brief
4 min read

tl;dr: A salaried employee, misclassified as exempt under the FLSA, sued for overtime. The court held that damages must be calculated using the “half-time” method, where the weekly salary is divided by all hours worked to find the regular rate.

Legal Significance: Establishes that in a “failed exemption” case involving a fixed salary, the default method for calculating overtime damages is the “half-time” method, not the “time-and-a-half” method based on a 40-hour workweek.

TORRES v. BACARDI GLOBAL BRANDS PROMOTIONS, INC. Law School Study Guide

Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.

Case Facts & Court Holding

Key Facts & Case Background

Plaintiff Carlos Torres worked for Bacardi Global Brands Promotions, Inc. for a fixed weekly salary, regardless of the number of hours he worked. Torres sued Bacardi under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), alleging he was misclassified as an exempt employee and was therefore owed overtime pay for hours worked in excess of forty per week. The parties did not dispute the facts for the purpose of the motion, but disagreed on the proper method for calculating potential overtime damages if Torres were found to be non-exempt at trial. Torres argued his regular rate of pay should be his weekly salary divided by forty hours, entitling him to 1.5 times that rate for all overtime hours. Bacardi filed a motion for partial summary judgment, contending that the correct method was to divide the fixed weekly salary by the total number of hours worked in a given week to determine the regular rate. Bacardi argued that because the salary already compensated Torres for all hours at a straight-time rate, he was only owed an additional half-time premium for overtime hours.

Court Holding & Legal Precedent

Issue: In an FLSA misclassification case where an employee received a fixed weekly salary intended to cover all hours worked, is the proper method for calculating overtime damages to divide the salary by the total hours worked to find the regular rate and then award an additional half-time premium for overtime hours?

Yes. The court granted the employer’s motion for partial summary judgment, holding Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?

IRAC Legal Analysis

Premium Feature Unlock

Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades

IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.

Legal Issue

In an FLSA misclassification case where an employee received a fixed weekly salary intended to cover all hours worked, is the proper method for calculating overtime damages to divide the salary by the total hours worked to find the regular rate and then award an additional half-time premium for overtime hours?

Conclusion

This case provides a clear framework for calculating damages in FLSA misclassification Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostr

Legal Rule

When a salaried employee is found to have been misclassified as exempt Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim

Legal Analysis

The court's analysis centered on the principle established in *Overnight Motor Transportation Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proiden

Flash-to-Full Case Opinions

Flash Summary

  • In a failed FLSA exemption case, a salaried employee’s overtime is
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in repr

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?