Hate ads? Verify for LSD+ → Learn More

Case Citation
Legal Case Name

Trans Union Corp. v. Federal Trade Commission Case Brief

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit2001Docket #64078333
245 F.3d 809 345 U.S. App. D.C. 301 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 6241 Administrative Law Constitutional Law Consumer Law

Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs

Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.

Adaptive Case Views

Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.

Exam-Ready IRAC Format

We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.

Complex Cases, Clarified

We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.

Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis

General Brief
4 min read

tl;dr: A credit bureau challenged an FTC order prohibiting it from selling consumer data lists for marketing. The court upheld the FTC, finding the lists were “consumer reports” under federal law and that the regulation did not violate the First Amendment.

Legal Significance: This case affirms an agency’s power to regulate commercial speech to protect consumer privacy, holding that targeted marketing lists derived from credit data are not protected public-issue speech and are subject to regulation under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).

Trans Union Corp. v. Federal Trade Commission Law School Study Guide

Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.

Case Facts & Court Holding

Key Facts & Case Background

Trans Union, a consumer reporting agency (CRA), compiled and sold target marketing lists to businesses. These lists contained only the names and addresses of consumers but were generated by selecting consumers from Trans Union’s main credit database who met specific, non-public credit-related criteria requested by the purchaser (e.g., possessing two or more mortgages, having a credit card with a certain limit). The Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the agency charged with enforcing the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), initiated an enforcement action. The FTC determined that because the lists were created using credit information and implicitly communicated that information to the buyer, they constituted “consumer reports” under the FCRA. The Act defines a “consumer report” as a communication of information by a CRA that was “collected in whole or in part for the purpose of serving as a factor in establishing the consumer’s eligibility for… credit.” Since target marketing is not a permissible purpose for disclosing consumer reports under the FCRA, the FTC ordered Trans Union to cease selling the lists. Trans Union petitioned for review, arguing the FTC’s finding was not supported by substantial evidence and that the FCRA, as applied, violated its First and Fifth Amendment rights.

Court Holding & Legal Precedent

Issue: Did the Federal Trade Commission act within its statutory authority and constitutional bounds by classifying Trans Union’s targeted marketing lists as “consumer reports” under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, thereby prohibiting their sale for marketing purposes?

Yes. The court denied the petition for review, holding that the FTC’s Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna a

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?

IRAC Legal Analysis

Premium Feature Unlock

Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades

IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.

Legal Issue

Did the Federal Trade Commission act within its statutory authority and constitutional bounds by classifying Trans Union’s targeted marketing lists as “consumer reports” under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, thereby prohibiting their sale for marketing purposes?

Conclusion

The decision solidifies the FTC's authority to regulate the use of consumer Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation

Legal Rule

Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, a "consumer report" includes any communication Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud ex

Legal Analysis

The court's analysis proceeded in two main parts. First, applying the administrative Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Flash-to-Full Case Opinions

Flash Summary

  • The court affirmed an FTC order holding that Trans Union’s target
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?

Hate ads? Verify for LSD+ → Learn More