Connection lost
Server error
United States v. Robert J. Sherman Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A doctor who lied under oath as an expert witness was prosecuted under a general perjury statute. The court held this was proper, even though it denied him a recantation defense available under a different statute, because his recantation came too late to qualify for the defense.
Legal Significance: Establishes that the recantation defense for perjury under 18 U.S.C. § 1623(d) is conjunctive, requiring recantation before the lie affects the proceeding and before its exposure becomes manifest. Affirms broad prosecutorial discretion in choosing between overlapping perjury statutes.
United States v. Robert J. Sherman Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Defendant Robert Sherman, serving as a plaintiff’s medical expert in a malpractice trial, testified falsely under oath. He claimed his medical licenses had merely lapsed and denied any history of disciplinary proceedings or license revocations. In reality, his licenses in multiple jurisdictions had been revoked due to severe misconduct, including one incident that resulted in a patient’s death. On cross-examination, opposing counsel systematically confronted Sherman with evidence of his revoked licenses and disciplinary history. After initially attempting to evade, Sherman admitted to the revocations when presented with direct questions about them. The government subsequently indicted Sherman on five counts of perjury under the general perjury statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1621, which does not provide for a recantation defense. Sherman moved to dismiss, arguing he should have been charged under 18 U.S.C. § 1623, which does contain a recantation defense, and that the government’s choice of statute violated his due process rights.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Did the government improperly deny the defendant a defense, in violation of due process, by prosecuting him under the general perjury statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1621, instead of the false declarations statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1623, which contains a recantation defense?
No. The government’s choice of statute was permissible because the defendant was Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur si
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Did the government improperly deny the defendant a defense, in violation of due process, by prosecuting him under the general perjury statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1621, instead of the false declarations statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1623, which contains a recantation defense?
Conclusion
This case solidifies broad prosecutorial discretion in charging under overlapping statutes and Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliqu
Legal Rule
The recantation defense under 18 U.S.C. § 1623(d) is available only when Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ulla
Legal Analysis
The court began with the principle from *United States v. Batchelder*, 442 Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- Prosecutors have discretion to charge under the general perjury statute (§