Connection lost
Server error
Vanna White v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. David Deutsch Associates Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A celebrity sued an advertiser for using a robot dressed to evoke her persona. The court expanded the celebrity’s property right in her “identity” to prohibit advertisements that remind the public of her, even without using her actual name or likeness.
Legal Significance: This case significantly expanded the common law right of publicity, recognizing a protectable property interest in a celebrity’s “identity” that can be infringed by mere evocation, not just direct use of name or likeness.
Vanna White v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. David Deutsch Associates Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. ran a print advertisement campaign for its VCRs, humorously depicting its products in the distant future. One ad featured a robot dressed in a blond wig, gown, and jewelry, posed next to a game board resembling that of the popular game show “Wheel of Fortune.” The ad’s caption read, “Longest-running game show. 2012 A.D.” Vanna White, the well-known hostess of “Wheel of Fortune,” sued Samsung and its advertising agency. White alleged that although the ad did not use her name, likeness, voice, or signature, it appropriated her identity for commercial purposes, thereby infringing on her property interest in her public persona. The humor of the ad was predicated on the audience recognizing the robot as a futuristic stand-in for White. The district court granted summary judgment for Samsung, finding no use of White’s likeness under California’s relevant statute or common law. The Ninth Circuit panel reversed, holding that White had a triable claim under the common law right of publicity. The full court declined to rehear the case en banc, prompting a vigorous dissent.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does a celebrity’s common law property right of publicity extend beyond their name and likeness to protect against the commercial appropriation of their “identity” through an advertisement that merely evokes their persona?
Yes. The court held that the common law right of publicity is Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does a celebrity’s common law property right of publicity extend beyond their name and likeness to protect against the commercial appropriation of their “identity” through an advertisement that merely evokes their persona?
Conclusion
This decision established a significant precedent by broadening the scope of the Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Legal Rule
The common law right of publicity protects against the appropriation of a Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute
Legal Analysis
The Ninth Circuit panel's decision expanded the right of publicity from a Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est lab
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
This text is a procedural order, not a substantive opinion. - The Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse