Case Citation
Legal Case Name

WHITE v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. Case Brief

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit1992
971 F.2d 1395 Intellectual Property Torts Constitutional Law

Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs

Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.

Adaptive Case Views

Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.

Exam-Ready IRAC Format

We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.

Complex Cases, Clarified

We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.

Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis

General Brief
3 min read

tl;dr: A celebrity sued an electronics company for using a robot dressed to look like her in an advertisement. The court expanded the common law right of publicity, holding it protects a celebrity’s ‘identity,’ not just their specific name or likeness.

Legal Significance: Established that the common law right of publicity is not limited to a ‘laundry list’ of appropriations like name or likeness, but broadly protects against the unauthorized commercial use of a celebrity’s recognizable ‘identity,’ even when evoked through indirect means.

WHITE v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. Law School Study Guide

Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.

Case Facts & Court Holding

Key Facts & Case Background

Plaintiff Vanna White, the famous hostess of the television game show “Wheel of Fortune,” sued Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (Samsung) over a print advertisement. The ad, part of a futuristic-themed campaign, depicted a female-shaped robot wearing a blond wig, an evening gown, and jewelry, which defendants consciously selected to resemble White’s signature look. The robot was posed on a game show set instantly recognizable as that of “Wheel of Fortune,” in a stance characteristic of White. The ad’s caption read: “Longest-running game show. 2012 A.D.” Defendants internally referred to the advertisement as the “Vanna White” ad. Unlike other celebrities featured in the campaign, White neither consented to the ad nor received compensation. White filed suit, alleging violations of California’s statutory and common law right of publicity, and a false endorsement claim under the Lanham Act. The district court granted summary judgment for Samsung on all claims.

Court Holding & Legal Precedent

Issue: Does the common law right of publicity protect a celebrity’s identity from commercial appropriation when an advertisement does not use the celebrity’s actual name or likeness, but instead uses a collection of elements that evoke the celebrity’s persona?

Yes. The court reversed the summary judgment on the common law right Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cup

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?

IRAC Legal Analysis

Premium Feature Unlock

Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades

IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.

Legal Issue

Does the common law right of publicity protect a celebrity’s identity from commercial appropriation when an advertisement does not use the celebrity’s actual name or likeness, but instead uses a collection of elements that evoke the celebrity’s persona?

Conclusion

This case significantly broadened the scope of the right of publicity, establishing Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitat

Legal Rule

The common law right of publicity is not limited to the appropriation Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo

Legal Analysis

The court first affirmed the dismissal of the statutory claim under California Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididu

Flash-to-Full Case Opinions

Flash Summary

  • A robot designed to evoke a celebrity does not use their
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?

I feel like I'm in a constant state of 'motion to compel' more sleep.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+