Hate ads? Verify for LSD+ → Learn More

Follow @lawschooldata on TikTok & Instagram

Admissions outcomes · Applicant reported

Admissions consulting data

Compare companies, their clients, and the cost of getting help. Start with outcomes at a school you care about.

Add your consulting answers

Applicants like me

Optional score ranges. Every comparison also adjusts the score mix within your selection.

Same school · Same cycle · Comparable scores

Lewis And Clark College

Entering fall 2022 · Help received before submission · Final reported acceptances and rejections

Not enough comparable data

This selection needs a sufficiently large no-consulting baseline and at least one company covering the same score groups. No estimate is shown when that comparison is unavailable.

Broader ranges may also be withheld when they contain a small group. Your selection is never broadened automatically.

The company behind the numbers

A closer look at 7Sage

Who are its clients, and how did they fare at other schools?

Clients with comparable scores at Lewis And Clark College

Select a school and company with a publishable outcome comparison to explore client scores. No individual applicant records are shown.

Results across schools

7Sage No consultant Adjusted rates · Approximate 95% intervals
School
0%50%100%

No publishable school comparisons for this company and score selection yet.

The cycle and score filters above apply here. Each school has its own baseline score mix; rates are comparable within a school. Schools without enough comparable data are omitted.

Cost & experience

What did clients buy, and would they hire again?

Optional answers about the whole engagement for applicants entering fall 2022. These charts use the cycle and type of help, independently of the school and score filters above.

Not enough responses to compare companies for this selection. Broader selections may also be withheld when they contain a small group.

Missing answers do not count as $0 or a negative experience. Each applicant contributes once per company and cycle. Companies appear alphabetically.

How this comparison works

Same score mix. Rates are directly standardized to the no-consulting applicants in this school, cycle, and score selection. Groups use exact LSAT scores crossed with GPA bands of 0.10 (for example, 3.80–3.89). Each company receives the same score-group weights. Differences within a GPA band can remain.

Comparable applications only. Each displayed company must have enough applicants in every baseline score group. Clients outside those groups are excluded from its displayed counts. Unknown company names, multiple-company applications, unanswered consulting fields, and missing or unconfirmed cycle scores are excluded. An unanswered field never counts as no consulting.

Outcome definition. The rate is acceptances among recorded acceptances and rejections in a completed cycle. Pending applications, unresolved waitlists, withdrawals, and deferrals are excluded. A final acceptance or rejection after a waitlist is included. Later consulting may also have influenced a result; this question records help before submission.

Uncertainty and privacy. Every contributing company/score group needs at least 30 applicants, including at least five acceptances and five rejections. An estimate with an approximate 95% interval wider than 30 percentage points is withheld. Small groups stay excluded from published totals across filters. Intervals use stratified binomial variance with fixed reference weights; they describe sampling uncertainty among respondents.

Client profiles and coverage. The overview and score distributions use exactly the same published groups as the selected school’s outcome chart. They exclude unmatched clients and unpublished companies; they are not population estimates of consulting use. Results across schools repeat each school’s own comparison, without combining them into a company-wide success rate.

Optional purchase details. Type of help, spending band, and hire-again answers describe the entire engagement, once per company and cycle. They use separate respondents from the outcome comparison and do not require a final admission decision. Every contributing type-of-help group needs at least 30 respondents to that question and five in each nonempty answer category. Broader selections containing a withheld group are also withheld. Private company names and unanswered purchase questions are excluded.

Association, not proof of effectiveness. Applicants choose whether to hire a consultant. These voluntary reports do not account for every difference in resources, background, application quality, or motivation. Adjustment for scores cannot establish that consulting caused an admission result.