Hate ads? Verify for LSD+ → Learn More

Follow @lawschooldata on TikTok & Instagram

Head-to-head · 16 cross-admits

When applicants got into both, 50% chose GW. Side-by-side on admissions, costs, and outcomes — sourced from 16 self-reported decisions and ABA 509 filings.

Choice, not ranking

These are decisions, not opinions. Scholarship offers, location, intended practice, and personal fit are all priced into the split.

16
cross-admits

Cross-admit decision

Of 16 applicants admitted to both schools
Last 5 cycles
George Washington University logo Chose GW
50%
Chose 'Bama University of Alabama logo
50%

Typical aid · ABA 509 · 2025

per year
$28,000
77.0% get a grant
$47,420 net tuition
$21,500
96.0% get a grant
$26,600 net tuition

Cross-admits who enrolled · self-reported, 3-yr award

$112,500
n = 8
$103,500
n = 6
View all-time (22 cross-admits)
46% chose GW 54% chose 'Bama
Rank summary
GW
#34
LSD
USN #26
'Bama
#34
LSD
USN #40
LSD rank reflects where admitted applicants actually enroll. USN ranks come from US News.

Admissions

Rankings, LSAT/GPA, acceptance & yield
2025 ABA 509
Metric
George Washington University logo
GW
Washington, D.C., Washington, D.C.
University of Alabama logo
'Bama
Tuscaloosa, Alabama
USN Rank
#26
#40
LSD Rank
#34 (0.013)
#34 (0.012)
LSAT 25th
162
161
LSAT Median
168
167
LSAT 75th
170
168
GPA Median
3.86
3.97
Acceptance Rate
27.2%
25.6%
Class Size
612
140
Yield Rate
22.5%
30.6%

Financial

Sticker price and scholarship aid
2025 ABA 509
Metric
George Washington University logo
GW
Washington, D.C., Washington, D.C.
University of Alabama logo
'Bama
Tuscaloosa, Alabama
Tuition (In-State)
$75,420
$24,980
Sticker Tuition
$75,420
$48,100
Median Grant
$28,000
$21,500
% Receiving Grants
77.0%
96.0%

Employment & outcomes

Post-graduation placement and bar passage
2025 ABA Employment
Metric
George Washington University logo
GW
Washington, D.C., Washington, D.C.
University of Alabama logo
'Bama
Tuscaloosa, Alabama
BigLaw (501+)
24.1%
9.6%
Federal Clerkships
2.6%
12.3%
State & Local Clerkships
7.2%
4.8%
NALP Median Salary (Private)
-
-
Employment Rate
96.8%
98.6%
Bar Pass Rate
90.2%
91.4%

Overview

About GW vs 'Bama

Across 16 applicants admitted to both schools and self-reporting on LSD, 50% enrolled at George Washington University and 50% at University of Alabama.

These numbers reflect every factor that goes into a real decision: scholarship offers, geographic preference, intended practice area, and fit. Choosing one school doesn't mean it's "better" — it means the pool of cross-admits, weighing their options, ended up there more often. Pair this with the scholarship distribution and employment outcomes above for full context.

Looking at a different matchup? Browse all comparisons or run a custom pair from the index.

Deciding between GW and 'Bama? Work with a consultant who knows both — backed by this exact data.
Join waitlist →

Compare another pair

vs
Detailed comparison narrative

This page compares George Washington University and University of Alabama across admissions data, cost of attendance, and employment outcomes using official ABA 509 disclosures.

In the U.S. News rankings, George Washington University is ranked #26 compared to #40 — a gap of 14 positions that often correlates with differences in employment outcomes and peer assessment scores.

George Washington University is located in Washington, D.C., Washington, D.C., while University of Alabama is in Tuscaloosa, Alabama. Regional placement matters: graduates tend to find employment near their law school, so location should factor into your decision alongside rankings and cost.

Employment outcomes differ substantially: George Washington University places 24.1% of graduates into large law firm positions, compared to 9.6% for the other school. This 15 percentage point gap is significant for applicants targeting BigLaw careers.

On cost, University of Alabama has lower tuition at $48,100 per year compared to $75,420. Combined with employment rates of 96.8% (GW) and 98.6% ('Bama), prospective students should weigh the cost-to-outcome ratio carefully.