Hate ads? Verify for LSD+ → Learn More

Follow @lawschooldata on TikTok & Instagram

Head-to-head · 10 cross-admits

When applicants got into both, 90% chose 'Bama. Side-by-side on admissions, costs, and outcomes — sourced from 10 self-reported decisions and ABA 509 filings.

Choice, not ranking

These are decisions, not opinions. Scholarship offers, location, intended practice, and personal fit are all priced into the split.

10
cross-admits

Cross-admit decision

Of 10 applicants admitted to both schools
Last 5 cycles
University of Alabama logo Chose 'Bama
90%
Chose Samford University Samford University logo
10%

Typical aid · ABA 509 · 2025

per year
$21,500
96.0% get a grant
$3,480 net tuition
$20,000
93.0% get a grant
$26,334 net tuition

Cross-admits who enrolled · self-reported, 3-yr award

$60,000
n = 8
—
n < 5
View all-time (26 cross-admits)
92% chose 'Bama 8% chose Samford University
Rank summary
'Bama
#34
LSD
USN #40
Samford University
#113
LSD
USN #122
LSD rank reflects where admitted applicants actually enroll. USN ranks come from US News.

Admissions

Rankings, LSAT/GPA, acceptance & yield
2025 ABA 509
Metric
University of Alabama logo
'Bama
Tuscaloosa, Alabama
Samford University logo
Samford University
Birmingham, Alabama
USN Rank
#40
#122
LSD Rank
#34 (0.012)
75+ (0.002)
LSAT 25th
161
154
LSAT Median
167
156
LSAT 75th
168
160
GPA Median
3.97
3.63
Acceptance Rate
25.6%
49.0%
Class Size
140
170
Yield Rate
30.6%
37.1%

Financial

Sticker price and scholarship aid
2025 ABA 509
Metric
University of Alabama logo
'Bama
Tuscaloosa, Alabama
Samford University logo
Samford University
Birmingham, Alabama
Tuition (In-State)
$24,980
$46,334
Tuition (Out-of-State)
$48,100
$46,334
Median Grant
$21,500
$20,000
% Receiving Grants
96.0%
93.0%

Employment & outcomes

Post-graduation placement and bar passage
2025 ABA Employment
Metric
University of Alabama logo
'Bama
Tuscaloosa, Alabama
Samford University logo
Samford University
Birmingham, Alabama
BigLaw (501+)
9.6%
5.8%
Federal Clerkships
12.3%
2.2%
State & Local Clerkships
4.8%
2.9%
Median Salary (Private)
-
-
Employment Rate
98.6%
89.2%
Bar Pass Rate
91.4%
78.8%

Overview

About 'Bama vs Samford University

Across 10 applicants admitted to both schools and self-reporting on LSD, 90% enrolled at University of Alabama and 10% at Samford University.

These numbers reflect every factor that goes into a real decision: scholarship offers, geographic preference, intended practice area, and fit. Choosing one school doesn't mean it's "better" — it means the pool of cross-admits, weighing their options, ended up there more often. Pair this with the scholarship distribution and employment outcomes above for full context.

Looking at a different matchup? Browse all comparisons or run a custom pair from the index.

Deciding between 'Bama and Samford University? Work with a consultant who knows both — backed by this exact data.
Join waitlist →

Compare another pair

vs
Detailed comparison narrative

This page compares University of Alabama and Samford University across admissions data, cost of attendance, and employment outcomes using official ABA 509 disclosures.

In the U.S. News rankings, University of Alabama is ranked #40 compared to #122 — a gap of 82 positions that often correlates with differences in employment outcomes and peer assessment scores.

There is a meaningful difference in admissions competitiveness: University of Alabama has a median LSAT of 167 compared to 156, a gap of 11 points. This suggests applicants to University of Alabama face a more competitive admissions pool.

University of Alabama is significantly more selective, with an acceptance rate of 25.6% compared to Samford University's 49.0%.

Both schools are located in Alabama — University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa and Samford University in Birmingham — meaning graduates often compete in the same regional legal market.

On cost, University of Alabama has lower tuition at $24,980 per year compared to $46,334. Combined with employment rates of 98.6% ('Bama) and 89.2% (Samford University), prospective students should weigh the cost-to-outcome ratio carefully.