Head-to-head · 10 cross-admits
When applicants got into both, 60% chose Vermont Law. Side-by-side on admissions, costs, and outcomes — sourced from 10 self-reported decisions and ABA 509 filings.
Choice, not ranking
These are decisions, not opinions. Scholarship offers, location, intended practice, and personal fit are all priced into the split.
Cross-admit decision
Chose (Part-time) Mitchell
Median scholarship (chose (Part-time) Mitchell)
Median scholarship (chose Vermont Law)
Admissions
Rankings, LSAT/GPA, acceptance & yield
Financial
Sticker price, scholarships, and debt burden
Employment & outcomes
Post-graduation placement and bar passage 2024 ABA Employment
Cross-admit by cycle
How preferences shifted over recent cyclesRelated comparisons
Other popular cross-admit matchups
(Part-time) Syracuse University
11
(Part-time) University of Dayton
10
Vermont Law School
10
Overview
About (Part-time) Mitchell vs Vermont Law
Across 10 applicants admitted to both schools and self-reporting on LSD, 40% enrolled at (Part-time) Mitchell Hamline and 60% at Vermont Law School.
These numbers reflect every factor that goes into a real decision: scholarship offers, geographic preference, intended practice area, and fit. Choosing one school doesn't mean it's "better" — it means the pool of cross-admits, weighing their options, ended up there more often. Pair this with the scholarship distribution and employment outcomes above for full context.
Looking at a different matchup? Browse all comparisons or run a custom pair from the index.
Compare another pair
Detailed comparison narrative
This page compares (Part-time) Mitchell Hamline and Vermont Law School across admissions data, cost of attendance, and employment outcomes using official ABA 509 disclosures.
Among cross-admitted applicants, (Part-time) Mitchell Hamline offered a median scholarship of $87,017 compared to $75,000, a difference of $12,017 that may factor into enrollment decisions.