The life of the law has not been logic; it has been experience.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+

Legal Definitions - a priori assumption

LSDefine

Definition of a priori assumption

A priori assumption refers to a belief or conclusion that is accepted as true without any examination of the facts, evidence, or specific details related to the situation at hand. It is a presumption made beforehand, without requiring proof or observation.

  • Example 1: In a courtroom setting

    Imagine a juror entering a trial for a defendant accused of theft. If the juror immediately believes the defendant is guilty simply because they have a tattoo or a certain style of clothing, without having heard any testimony or seen any evidence specific to the current case, this would be an a priori assumption. The juror is presuming guilt based on a preconceived notion rather than an assessment of the facts presented during the trial.

  • Example 2: In business strategy

    A company's marketing department might decide to target only younger demographics for a new product, *assuming* that older adults would not be interested in adopting new technology. If this decision is made without conducting market research, surveys, or focus groups to understand the actual preferences of different age groups, it is an a priori assumption. They are proceeding based on a general belief rather than data-driven insights.

  • Example 3: In public policy debates

    A local government might propose a new regulation to restrict street vendors, *assuming* that all street vendors contribute to increased litter and noise complaints. If this policy is drafted and implemented without first gathering data on actual litter levels, noise complaints, or the specific practices of local street vendors, it is an a priori assumption. The policy is based on a general presumption rather than an investigation into the specific facts of the situation.

Simple Definition

An "a priori assumption" is a belief or premise accepted as true without any prior examination of facts or need for proof. This contrasts with "a posteriori" reasoning, which relies on evidence gathered from observation or experience. In legal contexts, such assumptions are made theoretically rather than based on specific factual assessment.

A lawyer without books would be like a workman without tools.

✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+