Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

absolute privilege

Read a random definition: parricidium

A quick definition of absolute privilege:

Absolute privilege means that in certain situations, a person cannot be held responsible for saying something that might be harmful to someone else's reputation. This applies to specific places or circumstances, and it is a complete defense. It doesn't matter if what the person said was true or not, or if they meant to hurt someone. Absolute privilege applies to people like judges, lawyers, jurors, and witnesses in legal proceedings, as well as statements made during a trial or in a legal document.

A more thorough explanation:

Absolute privilege is a legal term that means a person cannot be held responsible for making defamatory statements in certain situations. This means that even if the statement is false and harmful, the person who made it cannot be sued for defamation.

Examples of situations where absolute privilege applies include:

  • Statements made by judges, lawyers, and witnesses in court proceedings
  • Statements made by legislators during legislative proceedings
  • Statements made by government officials in the course of their duties

For instance, if a witness testifies in court and makes a defamatory statement about someone, they cannot be sued for defamation because they have absolute privilege. This is because the law recognizes that certain situations require people to speak freely and without fear of being sued for defamation.

absolute disparity | absolute-bar rule

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Can y'all help me understand something lol. What does it mean for an app to "go complete"? Is that when the school has reviewed it and made a decision?
13:35
Na, it's when they have all the required information
Gotcha. So what would be the difference between received and completed?
Does complete entail like the app + LORs?
13:35
correct
That makes sense. Thank you!
13:36
complete basically means they've acknowledged receipt and it's ready to go under review whenever they start the deliberative process
Quillinit
13:40
I still haven't had Chicago or Cornell go complete, but I think that's just how they be
13:41
when did you submit
CaringEquableGuppy
13:42
How do you know when an application is complete? Is it on LSAC or the school's portal?
13:43
it'll be on the school-specific portal
Quillinit
13:44
when they opened
Quillinit
13:45
they both say something along the lines of "received and waiting to be processed"
13:48
anyone have good resources for revising a personal statement for reuse after applying with it last cycle?
13:49
Any guesses when Cornell and Penn CRS fee waivers will go out?
13:51
@Quillinit: from my recollection, chicago and cornell collapse complete/UR1 into a single step, so they may simply not be ready to begin reviewing applications
13:52
i think it's fair to assume, barring a handful of schools like UVA, most schools won't begin reviewing applications in earnest until the beginning of next month at the earliest, so it wouldn't be surprising to hear that applications are just sitting in the queue
13:54
@oakenrays: I was just gonna write a new one personally but I think you want to make it recognizably different from your previous PS
13:56
@baddestbunny: definitely agree that some revision and additional information is warranted but, my why law is the same... I guess just tell the same story in a different way
14:03
ugh fineeee I'll write a new stupid essay
14:07
yeah I told my last essay about a formative experience and am trying to update it now to be about what I’ve learned since that experience
recently wrapped up interview
i re-wrote my PS this cycle when I reapplied
fire drill at work
so lit
Quillinit
15:10
oh fun @info-man, Chicago just changed to complete today, so we'll see
boglue
15:23
do you have to have lawhub advantage for the lsd status checker to work
lawhub kind of a freaky ass name now that i think about it
16:22
The reason why today’s Image-Fiction isn’t the rescue from a passive, addictive TV-psychology that it tries so hard to be is that most Image-Fiction writers render their material with the same tone of irony and self-consciousness that their ancestors, the literary insurgents of Beat and postmodernism, used so effectively to rebel against their own world and context. And the reason why this irreverent postmodern approach fails to help the new Imagists transfigure TV is simply that TV has beaten the new Imagists to the punch.
Quillinit
16:26
idk lsd status checker button hasn't worked for me this whole cycle so far
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.