Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

ademption by extinction

Read a random definition: intra luctus tempus

A quick definition of ademption by extinction:

Ademption by extinction happens when someone tries to give a gift in their will, but the thing they wanted to give is no longer theirs when they die. For example, if a mom wanted to give her son a house in her will, but she sold the house before she died, the son can't get the house because it's not hers to give anymore. Even if the mom got money from selling the house, the son can't have that money instead. Sometimes it's not clear if a change to the thing being given is enough to count as ademption, but the court will try to figure out what the person who wrote the will wanted to happen.

A more thorough explanation:

Ademption by extinction is a legal term that means when someone leaves property to someone else in their will, but that property is no longer available when the will takes effect. This means that the person who was supposed to receive the property will not get it.

For example, if a father leaves his car to his son in his will, but he sells the car before he dies, the son will not get the car because it is no longer available. The gift of the car has been adeemed by extinction.

It is important to note that the person who was supposed to receive the property will not get anything else in its place. In the example above, the son will not get any money from the sale of the car.

There are some cases where it is not clear whether ademption by extinction has occurred. For example, if a mother leaves her son 100 shares of a certain stock in her will, but she sells those shares and buys 100 shares of a different stock before she dies, it is unclear whether the son will still receive the shares. Some courts have held that this is not ademption by extinction because the mother's intention was still to leave her son 100 shares of stock, even if it was a different type of stock.

Overall, ademption by extinction can be a complicated legal issue, but it is important to understand if you are creating or inheriting a will.

ademption | ademption by satisfaction

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
@llama: it would only be 17,000 ish per year
17:15
yeah and i think after 1L u get in state? not certain
I dont think so based on my very brief research
17:16
hmm I know some school offer that in their offer (I also believe KS does not negotiate) but I wonder which schools would reconsider with a condition of in state after 1L yr?
Dkk
17:17
@texaslawhopefully: Not necessarily but I believe what Aristotle used to say. He used to say you could not have a functioning political system if you can not get gender relations right. Or essentially that.
KS does negotiate! I got an email saying theyre doing it for the first time this year
its rather limited but its not nothing
17:18
@HopefullyInLawSchool: noted, thanks for the intel. I know we joke around but all things conidered, KS is goated
Dkk
17:18
@BigStrongBug: Nah aristotle only applies gender as a role which I think either sex could fulfill. My issue with Trump's EO to limit things to only sex but I am fine with him doing it for now.
Yeah and Aristotle old as hell boy he would’ve died of hysteria after learning what the internet and tiktok is
Dkk
17:19
@SplitterusClitterus: I think some school shootings could have been prevented if gender relations were better.
Very few of any,, none come to my mind tbh
17:19
@llama: hi
They all seem like mental health and access to gun issues
Not mental health regarding gender and usually it’s a gun kids get right in the house
JumpySubsequentDolphin
17:20
SPLITTYYYYY
DOLPHYYY HIIIII
My love
@llama: thanks! ya KU is a very serious school on my list, but we'll see how the cards play out
Hi splitty hi jumpy!
Irish dinosaur whatuoppplp r u new
No this is taradactyl
17:21
@IrishDinosaur: congratz on UCLA!!
Everyone is changing their name omgggg hi tatadajaucuoly
Dkk
17:21
@SplitterusClitterus: Well, I would say almost every one of them. Either due to more stable households, community connections or even better treatment of those going through divorced and whatnot. Almost every shooter has at least one of these elements included with their reasons for killing.
texaslawhopefully
17:21
@Dkk: No. Aristotle said the family was the fundamental political unit, which is different than what you're saying. But, more to the point, the American political system exists vis-a-vis to 17/18th century political thought, or classical liberalism. Of which the central assumption is that the highest end is social choice.
OMG WHYSTAYAYAYAYA VONGRATSS ON UFLAAA WHATT CONGRATS
Dkk
17:21
@texaslawhopefully: he said more than one thing.
Thanks y’all! I’m pumped about it
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.