Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

adjectio dominii per continuationem possessionis

Read a random definition: in apicibus juris

A quick definition of adjectio dominii per continuationem possessionis:

Adjectio Dominii Per Continuationem Possessionis: This is a fancy Latin term that means if you keep something for a long time, it becomes yours. It's like when you borrow a toy from a friend and keep it for so long that it feels like it's yours. This is also called usucapio or acquisitive prescription.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Adjectio dominii per continuationem possessionis is a Latin term used in Roman law to refer to the acquisition of the right to property ownership by continued possession. It is also known as usucapio or acquisitive prescription.

Examples: An example of adjectio dominii per continuationem possessionis is when a person has been living in a house for a certain period of time without any objection from the owner, and they eventually acquire the right to own the property. Another example is when a person has been using a piece of land for farming for a certain period of time, and they eventually acquire the right to own the land.

Explanation: Adjectio dominii per continuationem possessionis is a legal concept that allows a person to acquire ownership of a property or land through continued possession. This means that if a person has been using a property or land for a certain period of time without any objection from the owner, they can eventually acquire the right to own it. This concept is based on the idea that if a person has been using a property or land for a long time, they should have the right to own it.

adject | adjective law

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
YRDSL
21:31
@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State
texaslawhopefully
21:40
lmfao I didn't even notice that
21:42
Yeah to penn Carey students I’m sure that is a
21:42
Those are fighting words
21:46
@Dkk: one of the most deranged documents i've ever had the displeasure of reading
lilypadfrog
22:03
sometimes I go into fight or flight mode until I get all my work done
i call that locking in
Dkk
22:29
@info-man: Indeed!
22:43
No movement today
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.