Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Administrator Ad Prosequendum

Read a random definition: Enrollment Office

A quick definition of Administrator Ad Prosequendum:

An Administrator Ad Prosequendum is a person appointed by a court to bring and handle a legal case on behalf of someone who has died. This usually happens when the person did not leave a will. The Administrator Ad Prosequendum is often appointed in cases where someone has died because of someone else's actions, and the case may affect how the deceased person's belongings are given out. Different states have different rules about who can be appointed as the Administrator Ad Prosequendum and where they can bring the case.

A more thorough explanation:

An Administrator Ad Prosequendum is a person appointed by a court to bring and prosecute a case on behalf of a deceased person's estate. This usually happens when the person died without leaving a will. The Administrator Ad Prosequendum is appointed to handle cases that may affect the distribution of the deceased person's estate, such as wrongful death claims.

For example, in California, if there are several people who have equal priority to be appointed as the administrator of the estate, the court may appoint a neutral public administrator to handle the case. In New Jersey, an administrator can only bring a legal action in the county where the deceased person lived before they died or in the county where the accident happened if they lived outside of New Jersey.

Overall, an Administrator Ad Prosequendum is an important role in ensuring that the deceased person's estate is properly represented in legal matters.

administrator ad litem | Administrator cum testamento annexo

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.